Flyingin virtual pnl mode

A quiet place for budding model makers to share thoughts, get answers to questions and request and share references.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
hobby
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1172
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 12:01
Location: UK

Flyingin virtual pnl mode

Post by hobby »

Does anyone here, when in an established cruise en route, use 'virtual pnl'?

If so, at what 'magnification' do you fly, or does that depend on the particular aircrtaft being flown?

Recently while flying the default DC3 during the 'cruise' in virtual pnl mode using Norman Hancock's new panel with the air file version RR4 I have been experimenting with a 'magnification' of 0.45. The new aircraft cfg gives a different pilot's eyepoint posn enabling one, in virtual pnl mode, to look out over one's left shoulder and see the countryside below the port wingtip and trailing edge. One does feel as though one is seated in the aircraft.

Those who use IR specs probably have the best viewpoint but I have decided not to purchase that piece of equipment.

I should be interested to hear of other FS pilots experiences.

User avatar
jonesey2k
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2613
Joined: 13 Aug 2004, 13:59
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Post by jonesey2k »

I normally use .70 with the eyepoint moved a bit back and tilted down so I get the same sort of view as the 2d panel.
Error 482: Somebody shot the server with a 12 gauge.

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

Concur with Jonesey. If and when I do have time to goof in VC mode, I end up having it at the same mag as 2D.. normally around 75% :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
hinch
VC10
VC10
Posts: 534
Joined: 24 Aug 2006, 01:34
Contact:

Post by hinch »

yeah one tap of the minus key, i often use the hat switch to move lower. The F1 c172 has the best default view so i often edit the panel config to match the angle.

Post Reply