Just Jane

Classic British Flight Sim forum.
Support for Maltby/Piper FS models & other Classic British freeware.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
DarrenL
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1121
Joined: 10 Aug 2010, 22:26
Location: In between Turweston & Cranfield

Re: Just Jane

Post by DarrenL »

Paul K wrote:The Panton brothers announced this a good while ago, maybe as far back as 2011. They had secured planning permission to extend East Kirkby's runway, and had sourced the first two airworthy Merlins. That was then - whats the latest ?
4th airworthy Merlin acquired, which is what has triggered the news I think.


All the newspapers still referring to a Lancaster as the aircraft their brother was killed in when it was a Halifax, but then most of them think the RAF in WWII only consisted of Spitfires and Lancasters.

User avatar
Nigel H-J
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 8118
Joined: 14 May 2005, 15:33
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Just Jane

Post by Nigel H-J »

When NX611 was first moved to Scampton (late 1973) she was owned by Lord Lilford and loaned to the RAF as a gate guardian
:-O :-O :doh: :$ It's me age!!! I always thought it was the Pantons who loaned her to Scampton, looks like Steve has put the record straight!! :lol:

Nigel
I used to be an optimist but with age I am now a grumpy old pessimist.

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Just Jane

Post by speedbird591 »

BBC News item on the telly this morning.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20886684

Ian :)

Reggie Mental
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 2
Joined: 19 Oct 2012, 11:29

Re: Just Jane

Post by Reggie Mental »

Lovely aeroplane that she is, can we afford another airworthy Lancaster?

I think I would prefer it retired and put in a museum so many more can get close to such pieces of history.

Many of these planes were built for war, not safety or reliability. It would be a tragedy if this machine crashed, killing it's display crew. There is no war left for Just Jane to fight. Best we preserve her on the ground.

Also I fear that she could be come another bottomless pit for money to be thrown in, like XH558 that could be best spent elsewhere.

User avatar
John
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1751
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 14:13
Location: Emsworth, Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Just Jane

Post by John »

Reggie Mental wrote:Lovely aeroplane that she is, can we afford another airworthy Lancaster?

It would be a tragedy if this machine crashed, killing it's display crew. There is no war left for Just Jane to fight. Best we preserve her on the ground.

Also I fear that she could be come another bottomless pit for money to be thrown in, like XH558 that could be best spent elsewhere.
Well each to their own, but I'd love to see it back in the air, especially alongside PA474. She was afterall built to fly ;)

Kind regards

John
never give up, never surrender

Image

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Just Jane

Post by speedbird591 »

Don't worry, Reggie. Nobody will make you pay for it if you don't want to. And S-Sugar is always available if you want to get up close to one in a museum.

Ian :)

Andrew Curran
Chipmunk
Chipmunk
Posts: 2
Joined: 02 Jan 2013, 14:26

Re: Just Jane

Post by Andrew Curran »

But these aeroplanes are not very safe. They were built for war after all.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Just Jane

Post by Garry Russell »

Welcome aboard Andrew :hello:

These aeroplanes are safe enough and operated safelty enough...otherwise they would not be allowed to fly.

Remember they are operating as a fraction of their capabilty and as such have enchanced performance.

They also contain a certain amount of upgrading so are not exactly how there were when built.
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
John
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1751
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 14:13
Location: Emsworth, Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Just Jane

Post by John »

I agree with Garry, they can be very safe. Think how long the other two Lancasters have been flying. Possibly 10 times beyond their original design life, simply because they're well maintained and flown so far below their limits they they are a lot less stressed. So why do some preserved aircraft crash? Sadly for the same reasons (a variety) that much younger (not military aircraft do).

Kind regards and it's great to have a calm debate :welldone:

John
Last edited by John on 06 Jan 2013, 21:11, edited 1 time in total.
never give up, never surrender

Image

User avatar
NigelC
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1047
Joined: 02 Oct 2007, 11:20
Location: Hednesford, Staffordshire, UK

Re: Just Jane

Post by NigelC »

NX611 (Now Just Jane) Blackpool, May 1971

Image
Image

"Speed building both sides.....passing one hundred knots.....V1..rotate...oh sh*t..."

Post Reply