Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Ee-gads..
ATB
DaveB
ATB
DaveB


Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Very sad...my thought to those concerned.
One slightly bright note
The figure of 50 aboard was put out by the Russians who didn't know that five had got off before the flight, can't imagine how they must feel
One slightly bright note
The figure of 50 aboard was put out by the Russians who didn't know that five had got off before the flight, can't imagine how they must feel
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Yes a few of those that got off for prayer time didn't make it back on before the last flight which opened up some spots for others who hadn't planned on getting a free ride.
Like Dave mentioned in your F35 thread, there always seams to be some sort of a trade off.
Like Dave mentioned in your F35 thread, there always seams to be some sort of a trade off.
- Airspeed
- The Reds & Concorde

- Posts: 10376
- Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
- Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
We would like to think that accidents would not happen like this any more.
Many Beaufort crews died before they discovered an elevator design error that plunged the aircraft into a non recoverable dive.
The Avro designer himself was killed when control cables were reverse - fitted, so designs were changed to avoid further errors.
Then the Comet tragedy as recently discussed on this forum.
If a country capable of space travel can still build an airliner that can be flown into a mountain, what can we expect of the F-35?
Is the world so profit - focussed that blunders go un - noticed?
Like the other contributors, my thoughts go to the families of the victims.
Many Beaufort crews died before they discovered an elevator design error that plunged the aircraft into a non recoverable dive.
The Avro designer himself was killed when control cables were reverse - fitted, so designs were changed to avoid further errors.
Then the Comet tragedy as recently discussed on this forum.
If a country capable of space travel can still build an airliner that can be flown into a mountain, what can we expect of the F-35?
Is the world so profit - focussed that blunders go un - noticed?
Like the other contributors, my thoughts go to the families of the victims.
Cheers, Mike.
Perspective determines interpretation.

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html
Perspective determines interpretation.

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html
- Chris Trott
- Vintage Pair

- Posts: 2592
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
I doubt this was a mechanical failure. Other news stories report the crew requested a descent from 10,000 to 6,000 feet. The impact is on a ridge that rises to over 7,000 feet. Sad fact of some of these countries is that their ATC is still not out of the 1950's in many ways and CFIT is an all-too-common occurrence because they clear aircraft to descend into terrain. EGPWS helps to avoid this, but it's not foolproof.
-
Hot_Charlie
- Concorde

- Posts: 1018
- Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 23:51
- Location: Bomber County
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Sad fact is that in some countries, aircrew are still not out the 1950s.Chris Trott wrote: Sad fact of some of these countries is that their ATC is still not out of the 1950's in many ways
Charlie
[Intentionally Blank]
[Intentionally Blank]
- Chris Trott
- Vintage Pair

- Posts: 2592
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Maybe, but this was supposedly a Russian flight crew unfamiliar with the area and with charts that are notoriously unreliable. That is where ATC is supposed to come in to "back stop" the crew.
- Airspeed
- The Reds & Concorde

- Posts: 10376
- Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
- Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Yes Guys,
I did quote a history of mechanical faults, but I was concentrating on the design faults.
My line of thought was that there could have been an on-board warning device that an obstacle was on the flight path. Is that too "Buck Rogers?"
I did quote a history of mechanical faults, but I was concentrating on the design faults.
My line of thought was that there could have been an on-board warning device that an obstacle was on the flight path. Is that too "Buck Rogers?"
Cheers, Mike.
Perspective determines interpretation.

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html
Perspective determines interpretation.

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html
Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100
Terrian Avoidance System or TAS alert a pilot of an imminent collision into terrian Mike.
But sadly controlled flight into terrian stll happens.
But sadly controlled flight into terrian stll happens.




