Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry


User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by DaveB »

Ee-gads.. :-O

ATB
DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by Garry Russell »

Very sad...my thought to those concerned.

One slightly bright note

The figure of 50 aboard was put out by the Russians who didn't know that five had got off before the flight, can't imagine how they must feel
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
airboatr
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 6839
Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 07:17

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by airboatr »

Yes a few of those that got off for prayer time didn't make it back on before the last flight which opened up some spots for others who hadn't planned on getting a free ride.
Like Dave mentioned in your F35 thread, there always seams to be some sort of a trade off.

User avatar
Airspeed
The Reds & Concorde
The Reds & Concorde
Posts: 10376
Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
Contact:

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by Airspeed »

We would like to think that accidents would not happen like this any more.
Many Beaufort crews died before they discovered an elevator design error that plunged the aircraft into a non recoverable dive.
The Avro designer himself was killed when control cables were reverse - fitted, so designs were changed to avoid further errors.
Then the Comet tragedy as recently discussed on this forum.
If a country capable of space travel can still build an airliner that can be flown into a mountain, what can we expect of the F-35?
Is the world so profit - focussed that blunders go un - noticed?
Like the other contributors, my thoughts go to the families of the victims. :((
Cheers, Mike.
Perspective determines interpretation.
Image

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2592
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by Chris Trott »

I doubt this was a mechanical failure. Other news stories report the crew requested a descent from 10,000 to 6,000 feet. The impact is on a ridge that rises to over 7,000 feet. Sad fact of some of these countries is that their ATC is still not out of the 1950's in many ways and CFIT is an all-too-common occurrence because they clear aircraft to descend into terrain. EGPWS helps to avoid this, but it's not foolproof.

Hot_Charlie
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1018
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 23:51
Location: Bomber County

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by Hot_Charlie »

Chris Trott wrote: Sad fact of some of these countries is that their ATC is still not out of the 1950's in many ways
Sad fact is that in some countries, aircrew are still not out the 1950s.
Charlie

[Intentionally Blank]

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2592
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by Chris Trott »

Maybe, but this was supposedly a Russian flight crew unfamiliar with the area and with charts that are notoriously unreliable. That is where ATC is supposed to come in to "back stop" the crew.

User avatar
Airspeed
The Reds & Concorde
The Reds & Concorde
Posts: 10376
Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
Contact:

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by Airspeed »

Yes Guys,
I did quote a history of mechanical faults, but I was concentrating on the design faults.
My line of thought was that there could have been an on-board warning device that an obstacle was on the flight path. Is that too "Buck Rogers?" :dunno:
Cheers, Mike.
Perspective determines interpretation.
Image

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html

User avatar
airboatr
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 6839
Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 07:17

Re: Russia's Disastrous Demo of their Superjet 100

Post by airboatr »

Terrian Avoidance System or TAS alert a pilot of an imminent collision into terrian Mike.
But sadly controlled flight into terrian stll happens.

Post Reply