been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Techy111 · Post by **Techy111** » 23 Feb 2009, 20:00

Seems a bit more "colourful" in FSX...???

Well.....on my screen it does...

Tony

Ben Hartmann · Post by **Ben Hartmann** » 23 Feb 2009, 20:04

Ian

Please See my PM ;-)

Rgds

Ben

Post by **DaveB** » 23 Feb 2009, 20:28

Well.....on my screen it does...

EXACTLY ;-) I see little difference to be honest mate. Your's have a slightly bluer tint (on my monitor) but without flying at exactly the same time of day.. it's almost akin to asking how long a piece of string is

Still.. very nice Tony

ATB

DaveB :tab:

speedbird591 · Post by **speedbird591** » 23 Feb 2009, 20:33

Techy111 wrote:Seems a bit more "colourful" in FSX...???

The colours do look a bit too saturated there, Tony. Try turning the visibility down. 10-15 miles would be about right for Hong Kong most days. That oughta fix it!

Ian

Thanks for the PM, Ben.

SkippyBing · Post by **SkippyBing** » 23 Feb 2009, 20:43

The only thing I don't like about the Fly Tampa Kai Tak is the sparsity of shipping in the harbour, but I can't see anyway they could have got the requisite density of shipping without it becoming a slideshow! Maybe I'll see if I can make a traffic file to route some through there....

speedbird591 · Post by **speedbird591** » 23 Feb 2009, 20:57

SkippyBing wrote:The only thing I don't like about the Fly Tampa Kai Tak is the sparsity of shipping in the harbour, but I can't see anyway they could have got the requisite density of shipping without it becoming a slideshow! Maybe I'll see if I can make a traffic file to route some through there....

Spot on, Skippy (as usual!)

The thing about the harbour is the amount of traffic it carries. The AI ships in FlyTampa are very basic and don't stand up to close inspection which is how they get away with having them at all. It would be great to see more, but as you say it would put a strain on the otherwise excellent frame rates. Let us know how you get on!

Seeing as everyone's posting screenshots, here's one from a different viewpoint. This is my background wallpaper at the mo. The aircraft is AI hence not top quality.

Ian

jonesey2k · Post by **jonesey2k** » 23 Feb 2009, 21:43

Heh heh heh...

Techy111 · Post by **Techy111** » 23 Feb 2009, 23:42

There is this that may help guys....not sure if it works with Fly Tampa...but it can't hurt to try...?

http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?Ca ... LID=116499

Tony

Techy111 · Post by **Techy111** » 24 Feb 2009, 00:48

Getting that Chequerboard approach just right....i am sooooo proud.... :brick:

As a little edit here....anyone noticed Vistaliners site has disappeared...?

Tony

speedbird591 · Post by **speedbird591** » 24 Feb 2009, 14:33

jonesey2k wrote:Heh heh heh...

There's always one, isn't there? :roll:

Tony - I think maybe you took the 'checkerboard approach' thing too literally? The idea is to miss it - it's not the same technique as a dartboard

Not so funny about the Vistaliners site. I was just going to go and download the Tristar! Perhaps Erick will be along soon and put us out of our misery :-(

Ian

Classic British Flight Sim

been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong