G-AMRA repaint !
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry, The Painters
G-AMRA repaint !
Ok guys i have decided to run a poll for 3 days on the repaint of G-AMRA repaint i have done, If you think she looks good as she is now in the last screen shots i showed, then vote for yes, or if you think it looks way to much underdone and think it needs much more attention then vote no.
Last edited by Gerry-F on 26 Oct 2004, 16:51, edited 2 times in total.
Regards Gerry
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Fixed
Gerry always adds the extra 'A' so I think its about time Air Atlantique add one too
Later Edit....
Sri Gerry, I voted no (as you knew I would)
An explanation of my cruel vote is quite simple really (for those wondering why)...
There are 3 main areas of flightsim aircraft as I see it... the inside (panel e t c) the outside and FD's. FD's are always open to comment as Flightsim is only able to cope with so much reality for your £40 or however much it was and similar restrictions are imposed internally. It is just not possible to make a panel and/or the associated views LOOK like the inside of a real aircraft within the confines of a CRT or LCD so compromises have to be made. However, the outside does not suffer any such restriction (other than the way a particular colour is displayed) so it should be right. No mention here of dynamic shine or alpha channels... just the basic paintwork.
There you go
DaveB :smt025
Gerry always adds the extra 'A' so I think its about time Air Atlantique add one too
Later Edit....
Sri Gerry, I voted no (as you knew I would)
An explanation of my cruel vote is quite simple really (for those wondering why)...
There are 3 main areas of flightsim aircraft as I see it... the inside (panel e t c) the outside and FD's. FD's are always open to comment as Flightsim is only able to cope with so much reality for your £40 or however much it was and similar restrictions are imposed internally. It is just not possible to make a panel and/or the associated views LOOK like the inside of a real aircraft within the confines of a CRT or LCD so compromises have to be made. However, the outside does not suffer any such restriction (other than the way a particular colour is displayed) so it should be right. No mention here of dynamic shine or alpha channels... just the basic paintwork.
There you go
DaveB :smt025
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
I seem to be getting more positive than negative answers at the moment to those who would like me to upload the repaint, This is a repaint i did off my back as something for myself and not one that i was asked to do and was expected to get every detail right or dont bother at all, I am only trying to say this, that i have done a repaint of this aircraft as far as i want to go on it and not get it 100% correct to exacts, sure if i was doing this as a repaint job for someone who asked then ok i would go the extra mile and keep trying and trying until i get it correct down to every detail, including the right texture for the right model, as it is for the cargo version, the one i have done.
Dave you said about Ricks JP that i wouldnt have liked it had it been released if it had dodgy wings & flaps, you got to remember that Rick is far more talented than me, and does my repaint really look that bad that it looks like it has dodgy wings etc, cheers mate :shock: , I dont seem to be able to get my repaints to standards required, although i didnt think there was a standard that repaints are expected to be to stand a chance of acceptance to be allowed :? .
Sorry if this all sounds like acting like im a complete twit but it just feels that i cant get things good enough, i do try to make my work good, but i still need a long way it seems to be a repainter acceptable to release repaints.
Dave you said about Ricks JP that i wouldnt have liked it had it been released if it had dodgy wings & flaps, you got to remember that Rick is far more talented than me, and does my repaint really look that bad that it looks like it has dodgy wings etc, cheers mate :shock: , I dont seem to be able to get my repaints to standards required, although i didnt think there was a standard that repaints are expected to be to stand a chance of acceptance to be allowed :? .
Sorry if this all sounds like acting like im a complete twit but it just feels that i cant get things good enough, i do try to make my work good, but i still need a long way it seems to be a repainter acceptable to release repaints.
Regards Gerry
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
That's fine Gerry although I fear you took my comments personally and that was not my intention hence, why I qualified my 'No' vote.
I voted 'No' cause I want to see it finished... plain and simple. Were that going to happen, I'd be at the front of the downloaders. As this would seem unlikely, I don't think I'll bother. Sri mate
daveB :smt025
I voted 'No' cause I want to see it finished... plain and simple. Were that going to happen, I'd be at the front of the downloaders. As this would seem unlikely, I don't think I'll bother. Sri mate
daveB :smt025
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
- blanston12
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 20:45
- Location: San Francsico, California