Anniversary

Links to Classic British Flightsim themed images only please.
Please post in jpg or png format and no bigger than 1024 x 768

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
ukmil
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 18:35
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Anniversary

Post by ukmil »

of 43 sqn

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
ukmil
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 18:35
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by ukmil »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
DaveG
The Gurus
Posts: 8089
Joined: 23 Jun 2004, 18:05
Location: in a deep, dark hole somewhere.
Contact:

Post by DaveG »

Very tasty. Love '757 with the black tail.
Dave G.

User avatar
ukmil
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 18:35
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by ukmil »

have another

Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
AlexP
Trident
Trident
Posts: 347
Joined: 24 Mar 2006, 17:07
Location: Bomber County, England

Post by AlexP »

If I’ve read this correctly http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/scene.htm (second article down - 13 February 2007 - Leuchars) ‘757 was at one point completely black!
That must have looked awesome.

Alex
Image

User avatar
ukmil
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 18:35
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by ukmil »

it was black, for a short time, and many pics are available on airliners.net, but it was actually illegal, so it was painted back to grey very soon afterwards
Image

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

Why was it illegal DC?? Just curious :wink:

753 looks absolutely blindin' :thumbsup:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
ukmil
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 18:35
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by ukmil »

every aircraft that flies, needs to have the colour scheme auth'd by the CAA, especially ones that are as 757 was going to be, as it would stand out in the sky.

Also, the extra weight carried by all the black paint, made the weight and moment incorrect

couple with the fact that 43sqn never actually gained permission via the proper RAF channels, for this scheme, and just painted it 'off the cuff' it was almost immediatly refused permission, on the grounds of incorrect procedure

if you see the very first photos, even the nose is black, whcih shows how much they acutally researched the project, as the Radar cannot operatre through paint, hence why later photos were seen with a replacement nose
Image

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

:lol: :lol: :lol:

I did wonder if it was for any or all of those reasons (excluding the weight of the black paint which I'd not considered) :smile: Basically, a faux pas from the word go :wink:

Didn't realise they'd even painted the radome. That, above everything else should have been a no no. They're even marked Do Not Paint aren't they! :roll:

Tks for that :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
AlexP
Trident
Trident
Posts: 347
Joined: 24 Mar 2006, 17:07
Location: Bomber County, England

Post by AlexP »

Thanks for the additional info regarding ZG757, really fills out the brief snippet I found on airsceneuk.

It really does look great in black:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1100822/L/

Pity the paint job affected the aircrafts characteristics and made it useless as a fighter :doh: (“Enemy aircraft!?! Don’t be daft my scopes clear! Now stop distracting me I’m really struggling to keep this thing in the air today.â€
Image

Post Reply