Attention BAC 1-11 pilots
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
- RAF_Quantum
- The Gurus
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
- Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
- Contact:
Attention BAC 1-11 pilots
Hi Guys
All BAC1-11's have been re-positioned to the UK. 200 series and 400 series flights will start appearing soon, as well as additional flights for the 500 series.
Shorter flights of under two hours have been scheduled for the 200/400's with an even mix between them. Longer routes have been reserved for the 500's. There are more 500 flights so the flight numbers have 'straddled the 200 series flight numbers to enable instant recognition of 1-11 series vs flight numbers.
BAC 1-11 500 flight numbers CBF1000 - CBF1199 plus CBF1300 - CBF1399
BAC 1-11 200 flight numbers CBF1200 - CBF1299
BAC 1-11 400 flight numbers CBF1400 - CBF1499
I have also updated the 'Flight Numbers' thread to reflect this.
Rgds
John
All BAC1-11's have been re-positioned to the UK. 200 series and 400 series flights will start appearing soon, as well as additional flights for the 500 series.
Shorter flights of under two hours have been scheduled for the 200/400's with an even mix between them. Longer routes have been reserved for the 500's. There are more 500 flights so the flight numbers have 'straddled the 200 series flight numbers to enable instant recognition of 1-11 series vs flight numbers.
BAC 1-11 500 flight numbers CBF1000 - CBF1199 plus CBF1300 - CBF1399
BAC 1-11 200 flight numbers CBF1200 - CBF1299
BAC 1-11 400 flight numbers CBF1400 - CBF1499
I have also updated the 'Flight Numbers' thread to reflect this.
Rgds
John
Last edited by RAF_Quantum on 08 Jun 2006, 22:54, edited 1 time in total.

- Rick Piper
- The Gurus
- Posts: 4773
- Joined: 18 Jun 2004, 17:20
- Location: In front of screen learning 3ds max :/ ...............Done it :)
- blanston12
- Battle of Britain
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 20:45
- Location: San Francsico, California
While I am glad that these AC are now available for use, its seams like cheating to just transfer them. I think that in the future we should only transfer planes in emergencies or if the AC does not have the range to make the transit, the standard way of moving AC should be setting up ferry flights and having our pilots fly them. I suggested this twice on the forum nobody seamed to notice.
Joe Cusick,

I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.

I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.
- Chris Trott
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
- blanston12
- Battle of Britain
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 20:45
- Location: San Francsico, California
Chris,
Having done it before for a different airline its not as much work as you imply, it does take some planning, I had even worked out and posted the route to get the 1-11's from north america back to the UK (5 stops none longer than 1000nm), its unfortunaly lost with the forums crash and restore.
Flynet only seams to put new aircraft in about 4 or 5 airports, so it makes planning a little easier. The biggest problem is that the pilots would have to pay for a ticket to get to the starting point, and it would be easier if FlyNET would allow an airline to setup a route that any of its aircraft could use.
If its just the time to set up the flights and then remove after all the ac have been moved, and I am the one saying we should do it and its not that much work to set it up I guess I had better be willing to step up and offer to do the work, and I am.
Having done it before for a different airline its not as much work as you imply, it does take some planning, I had even worked out and posted the route to get the 1-11's from north america back to the UK (5 stops none longer than 1000nm), its unfortunaly lost with the forums crash and restore.
Flynet only seams to put new aircraft in about 4 or 5 airports, so it makes planning a little easier. The biggest problem is that the pilots would have to pay for a ticket to get to the starting point, and it would be easier if FlyNET would allow an airline to setup a route that any of its aircraft could use.
If its just the time to set up the flights and then remove after all the ac have been moved, and I am the one saying we should do it and its not that much work to set it up I guess I had better be willing to step up and offer to do the work, and I am.
Joe Cusick,

I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.

I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.
- Chris Trott
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
I meant in FlyNET. You have to setup the flight in the system and get all of the information to fill it out and several other factors that limits you (the pilot) to where you can go. Like I said, it's easier to jsut transfer them in. Another thing to consider is cost. It costs many times more to ferry the airplane than to transfer it because the transfer doesn't work in the multiplier (which the actually flown ferry flights do).
- blanston12
- Battle of Britain
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 20:45
- Location: San Francsico, California
- RAF_Quantum
- The Gurus
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
- Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
- Contact:
Hi Joe,
To be honest, I've been very busy with the rest of the stuff and put the ferry thing to the back of my mind. If you want to come up with a route, I'll see what I can do. Aircraft are delivered in USA at KJFK or KORD, so if you want to make a route from both of those to say EGCC I'll put them on the system when I get a chance.
I'm expecting some more BAC1-11's so you need to do say max 3 hour legs(longer for your water crossing but keep as short as poss) for the 200/400's and say max 4 hour legs for the 500's. PLEASE give me 4-letter ICAO codes for each leg and flight times. Once you've made your route, check the FlyNET airport database to make sure they're already in the database. If any aren't then please pick another airport. These will become revenue flights.
Rgds
John
To be honest, I've been very busy with the rest of the stuff and put the ferry thing to the back of my mind. If you want to come up with a route, I'll see what I can do. Aircraft are delivered in USA at KJFK or KORD, so if you want to make a route from both of those to say EGCC I'll put them on the system when I get a chance.
I'm expecting some more BAC1-11's so you need to do say max 3 hour legs(longer for your water crossing but keep as short as poss) for the 200/400's and say max 4 hour legs for the 500's. PLEASE give me 4-letter ICAO codes for each leg and flight times. Once you've made your route, check the FlyNET airport database to make sure they're already in the database. If any aren't then please pick another airport. These will become revenue flights.
Rgds
John

- DispatchDragon
- Battle of Britain
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 01:18
- Location: On the corner of walk and dont walk somewhere on US1
- Contact:
- RAF_Quantum
- The Gurus
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
- Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
- Contact:
Hi Leif
Sure, I'm sure your route will be the most efficient. Depending on sector length, may have to tech stop for revenue purposes especially for the 2/400's with lower pax numbers. I presume we can run the reciprocal that you use. Please feel free to post here. We'll be starting from KORD or KJFK.
Rgds
John
Sure, I'm sure your route will be the most efficient. Depending on sector length, may have to tech stop for revenue purposes especially for the 2/400's with lower pax numbers. I presume we can run the reciprocal that you use. Please feel free to post here. We'll be starting from KORD or KJFK.
Rgds
John
