A sad day for Manchester

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
Jetset
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1028
Joined: 27 Apr 2005, 22:28
Location: 15NM South of EGCC

A sad day for Manchester

Post by Jetset »

As of the 6th June and the progress of Magnetic Variation, Manchester's runways which I have grown up as 24/06 with will be changed to 23/05. A very sad day!
Onwards and Upwards!!!!!!!!
Image
Jetty!
If God had of meant us to fly, he would have given us wings! He did, it's called an aeroplane!

cstorey
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1623
Joined: 11 Jul 2004, 19:36
Location: heswall, wirral

Post by cstorey »

It's these wandering poles that people get so excited about

AndyG
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1660
Joined: 22 Jul 2004, 08:57
Location: Sarf London

Post by AndyG »

For a moment I thought this might be a thread about Ranieri taking over at City!! :lol:

AndyG

User avatar
VEGAS
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3993
Joined: 15 Sep 2005, 22:41
Location: probably lost on the moors

Post by VEGAS »

Thats tragic. I only know them by 24/06 as well. Once introduced, I wonder how many regular pilots will get it wrong during the first few weeks.. :think:
Image I suffer from paranoid amnesia. I can't remember who I don't trust.Image

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2592
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by Chris Trott »

If our experience over here is any indication, every single one, including all of the controllers will misstep at least a half-dozen times before getting it right consistently.

When they changed the runways at Washington National, it was a nightmare for weeks because of pilots and controllers getting runways mixed up.

airboatr

Post by airboatr »

as long as the runway available is 24/7 operational
(careful how you word that over the radio...)
:roll:

why change runway nubering anyway?
seams silly to me

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Post by Garry Russell »

These things happen now and then.

Heathrow used to be 28/10

Don't remember it causeing too much trouble if any in the past especially as pilots are suppose to be constantly checking.

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Paul K
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 7835
Joined: 12 Jun 2005, 16:41
Location: Norfolk UK

Post by Paul K »

cstorey wrote:It's these wandering poles that people get so excited about
Lithuanians too...they're everywhere!

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Post by Garry Russell »

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
Chris Trott
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2592
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Contact:

Post by Chris Trott »

airboatr wrote:as long as the runway available is 24/7 operational
(careful how you word that over the radio...)
:roll:

why change runway nubering anyway?
seams silly to me
Because the runway number is the runway's magnetic heading rounded to the closest 10 degrees. This is to allow pilots flying on visual flight rules to have a general reference to what heading the runway will be on so that they can properly identify the runway markings and ensure that the markings (i.e. 28) matches up with their current heading (between 275 and 284) so that they're absolutely sure they're landing on the right runway. If the runway's heading is 280 and they number it 270, you're going to cause issues becuase the pilots can't confirm that they're landing on the right runway.

Post Reply