Page 3 of 5

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 20:00
by Techy111
Seems a bit more "colourful" in FSX...???

Image

Image

Image

Well.....on my screen it does... :lol:

Tony

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 20:04
by Ben Hartmann
Ian

Please See my PM ;-)

Rgds

Ben

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 20:28
by DaveB
Well.....on my screen it does...
:lol: :lol: :lol:
EXACTLY ;-) I see little difference to be honest mate. Your's have a slightly bluer tint (on my monitor) but without flying at exactly the same time of day.. it's almost akin to asking how long a piece of string is :cpu:
Still.. very nice Tony :rock:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 20:33
by speedbird591
Techy111 wrote:Seems a bit more "colourful" in FSX...???
The colours do look a bit too saturated there, Tony. Try turning the visibility down. 10-15 miles would be about right for Hong Kong most days. That oughta fix it!

Ian :lol:

Thanks for the PM, Ben.

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 20:43
by SkippyBing
The only thing I don't like about the Fly Tampa Kai Tak is the sparsity of shipping in the harbour, but I can't see anyway they could have got the requisite density of shipping without it becoming a slideshow! Maybe I'll see if I can make a traffic file to route some through there....

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 20:57
by speedbird591
SkippyBing wrote:The only thing I don't like about the Fly Tampa Kai Tak is the sparsity of shipping in the harbour, but I can't see anyway they could have got the requisite density of shipping without it becoming a slideshow! Maybe I'll see if I can make a traffic file to route some through there....
Spot on, Skippy (as usual!) :lol: The thing about the harbour is the amount of traffic it carries. The AI ships in FlyTampa are very basic and don't stand up to close inspection which is how they get away with having them at all. It would be great to see more, but as you say it would put a strain on the otherwise excellent frame rates. Let us know how you get on!

Seeing as everyone's posting screenshots, here's one from a different viewpoint. This is my background wallpaper at the mo. The aircraft is AI hence not top quality.

Image

Ian

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 21:43
by jonesey2k
Heh heh heh...

Image

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 23:42
by Techy111
There is this that may help guys....not sure if it works with Fly Tampa...but it can't hurt to try...?

http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?Ca ... LID=116499

Tony

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 24 Feb 2009, 00:48
by Techy111
Getting that Chequerboard approach just right....i am sooooo proud.... :brick:

Image

As a little edit here....anyone noticed Vistaliners site has disappeared...?

Tony

Re: been said before FlyTampa Homg Kong

Posted: 24 Feb 2009, 14:33
by speedbird591
jonesey2k wrote:Heh heh heh...
:lol: :lol: :lol: There's always one, isn't there? :roll:

Tony - I think maybe you took the 'checkerboard approach' thing too literally? The idea is to miss it - it's not the same technique as a dartboard :lol:

Not so funny about the Vistaliners site. I was just going to go and download the Tristar! Perhaps Erick will be along soon and put us out of our misery :-(

Ian