Page 2 of 3
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 01 Jan 2013, 12:46
by DarrenL
Paul K wrote:The Panton brothers announced this a good while ago, maybe as far back as 2011. They had secured planning permission to extend East Kirkby's runway, and had sourced the first two airworthy Merlins. That was then - whats the latest ?
4th airworthy Merlin acquired, which is what has triggered the news I think.
All the newspapers still referring to a Lancaster as the aircraft their brother was killed in when it was a Halifax, but then most of them think the RAF in WWII only consisted of Spitfires and Lancasters.
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 01 Jan 2013, 20:09
by Nigel H-J
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 02 Jan 2013, 08:30
by speedbird591
BBC News item on the telly this morning.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20886684
Ian

Re: Just Jane
Posted: 02 Jan 2013, 14:48
by Reggie Mental
Lovely aeroplane that she is, can we afford another airworthy Lancaster?
I think I would prefer it retired and put in a museum so many more can get close to such pieces of history.
Many of these planes were built for war, not safety or reliability. It would be a tragedy if this machine crashed, killing it's display crew. There is no war left for Just Jane to fight. Best we preserve her on the ground.
Also I fear that she could be come another bottomless pit for money to be thrown in, like XH558 that could be best spent elsewhere.
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 02 Jan 2013, 20:20
by John
Reggie Mental wrote:Lovely aeroplane that she is, can we afford another airworthy Lancaster?
It would be a tragedy if this machine crashed, killing it's display crew. There is no war left for Just Jane to fight. Best we preserve her on the ground.
Also I fear that she could be come another bottomless pit for money to be thrown in, like XH558 that could be best spent elsewhere.
Well each to their own, but I'd love to see it back in the air, especially alongside PA474. She was afterall built to fly
Kind regards
John
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 02 Jan 2013, 20:39
by speedbird591
Don't worry, Reggie. Nobody will make you pay for it if you don't want to. And S-Sugar is always available if you want to get up close to one in a museum.
Ian

Re: Just Jane
Posted: 02 Jan 2013, 20:58
by Andrew Curran
But these aeroplanes are not very safe. They were built for war after all.
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 02 Jan 2013, 21:13
by Garry Russell
Welcome aboard Andrew
These aeroplanes are safe enough and operated safelty enough...otherwise they would not be allowed to fly.
Remember they are operating as a fraction of their capabilty and as such have enchanced performance.
They also contain a certain amount of upgrading so are not exactly how there were when built.
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 03 Jan 2013, 07:49
by John
I agree with Garry, they can be very safe. Think how long the other two Lancasters have been flying. Possibly 10 times beyond their original design life, simply because they're well maintained and flown so far below their limits they they are a lot less stressed. So why do some preserved aircraft crash? Sadly for the same reasons (a variety) that much younger (not military aircraft do).
Kind regards and it's great to have a calm debate
John
Re: Just Jane
Posted: 06 Jan 2013, 16:47
by NigelC
NX611 (Now Just Jane) Blackpool, May 1971
