New Airfield

A quiet place for budding model makers to share thoughts, get answers to questions and request and share references.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

That's correct Ben.. St.Athan IS part of the current UK2000 portfolio as are most of the others already mentioned (if not all though I couldn't be sure) :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
ukmil
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 18:35
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by ukmil »

believe me, the scenery our designer is creating will knock the socks of any previous items.
i cant; show too much, but here is one view from the upcoming Leuchars pack, showing Ark Royal, from the old Q sheds, with Black mike

Image
Image

delticbob
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 682
Joined: 19 Aug 2005, 19:15
Location: Doncaster. UK

Post by delticbob »

DaveB wrote:That's correct Ben.. St.Athan IS part of the current UK2000 portfolio as are most of the others already mentioned (if not all though I couldn't be sure) :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
Gary Summons has done some great scenery's with his UK2000 series & St. Athan is one of those, but the bar gets moved forever upwards in tems of quality & content. I refer to my previous post about the RAF Coningsby scenery.

The fact that one person/company, (or more than one), makes one version, does not preclude more from throwing their hat in the ring.

I have the UK2000 series set that features RAF Coningby (payware) but in my opinion the current (freeware) MAIW RAF Coningsby scenery if far supeior, & for thicko's like me comes with its own instant airforce with ai planes & flight plans.

[sorry if this seems to be turning into a rant :shock: - not meant to].

I'm sure we wish UKMIL & its designers every success in whatever field it it they work on - textures - aircraft or scenery.

Bob
I can fly now with my fantastic new PC

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

Fair comment Bob and certainly not taken as a rant. Just because something has been done before should not stop it being done again for better or worse :wink:

The point being made was that there are so many airfields out there that haven't been done so why duplicate one that has. A difficult one to call and one that rests solely with the bod who's making it I'm afraid. We want more Bob I guess.. not more of the same/similar :lol:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16344
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Post by TSR2 »

One request I would make is that static model bgl can be removed... I can't remember which airfield I had in FS9, but the static hemp VC10's really anoyed me when I had proper VC10's parked next to them. :wink:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
ukmil
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 18:35
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by ukmil »

at our UKMIL airfield, we even have gate guards.

here is the new UKMIL Jaguar, converted into a GG

Image
Image

Post Reply