Fuel Flight Planning
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
That's exactly what I did and I got exactly the 30000kg I asked for... But I only used 8779kg which is my point - this is way out from what I thought the previous post indicated was necessary :think:
I think I'll go with Joe's advice and start checking previous flights for how much to use...
Thanks for the help!
I think I'll go with Joe's advice and start checking previous flights for how much to use...
Thanks for the help!
Last edited by dom1 on 13 Jun 2006, 19:19, edited 1 time in total.
Dom Mahon


- Chris Trott
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Heres a rule of thumb for the super.
Rate of climb has been very steady at 1800 fpm to FL320, burning roughly 2500kg per engine (10000kg/h) for the first 20 minutes. (although this is less below FL100 due to the speed limit)
I have been flying at FL320 with an IAS of 310 knots in fair weather. This gives a fuel burn of 1650 kg per hour PER ENGINE!!
Rate of climb has been very steady at 1800 fpm to FL320, burning roughly 2500kg per engine (10000kg/h) for the first 20 minutes. (although this is less below FL100 due to the speed limit)
I have been flying at FL320 with an IAS of 310 knots in fair weather. This gives a fuel burn of 1650 kg per hour PER ENGINE!!







- RAF_Quantum
- The Gurus
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 23:36
- Location: NE Lincolnshire UK
- Contact:
Hi Guys,
Some interesting conversations here which is why I started the thread in the first place. For FS9 I've found, as Rick has already mentioned I believe that to get fuel burn down in FS9 you HAVE to cruise as high as reasonably practicable and with consistent power settings. If you adjust power to cruise at a specific mach number at one altitude, you will use a different amount of fuel at a different altitude at the same mach number. I have found that you can significantly reduce the power setting with just a small loss of mach number but with much less fuel burn.
Even looking at some of the already flown VC10 flights there is no real pattern - 5hrs 30mins/2386nm = 29637kgs, 4hrs 54mins/2085nm = 33542kgs.
I'm pretty sure that the Client programme reads the fuel from FS9 with fsuipc - the client doesn't work out the fuel burn, hence the ability for those pilots of the Vanguard, that were initially using high fuel amounts due to incorrect aircraft.cfg, to fix the fuel consumption issue.
So the differences are probably down to 'pilot technique' - Dom, what's your secret ?
Rgds
John
Some interesting conversations here which is why I started the thread in the first place. For FS9 I've found, as Rick has already mentioned I believe that to get fuel burn down in FS9 you HAVE to cruise as high as reasonably practicable and with consistent power settings. If you adjust power to cruise at a specific mach number at one altitude, you will use a different amount of fuel at a different altitude at the same mach number. I have found that you can significantly reduce the power setting with just a small loss of mach number but with much less fuel burn.
Even looking at some of the already flown VC10 flights there is no real pattern - 5hrs 30mins/2386nm = 29637kgs, 4hrs 54mins/2085nm = 33542kgs.
I'm pretty sure that the Client programme reads the fuel from FS9 with fsuipc - the client doesn't work out the fuel burn, hence the ability for those pilots of the Vanguard, that were initially using high fuel amounts due to incorrect aircraft.cfg, to fix the fuel consumption issue.
So the differences are probably down to 'pilot technique' - Dom, what's your secret ?
Rgds
John

C'mon guys, you mean the VC10 wasn't designed as a glider...? No wonder I had so much trouble arranging a tow
I can't believe it's my technique though, I just did the usual and followed the checklist... I'm going to do the return leg now so I'll take a note of fuel usage as I'm going along and let you know if I work out the secret
(Just watch me run out of fuel on this leg...)

I can't believe it's my technique though, I just did the usual and followed the checklist... I'm going to do the return leg now so I'll take a note of fuel usage as I'm going along and let you know if I work out the secret
(Just watch me run out of fuel on this leg...)
Dom Mahon

