Pacific Fjords

If you have a payware prog whether it be a model, scenery or utility that you have tried.. tell us about it here.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16759
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by TSR2 »

The OS is constantly reading and writing to the C drive. In Win Vista and Win 7 (and Win 8) the C drive has special security applied to it. FS9 / FSX / P3D etc are more read than write so having them on a separate disk means that they aren't contesting with the OS for reads from the same disk. TBH its not just an FS thing, my boss in work is big into his photography and he uses a separate drive for his Lightroom catalogues for much the same reasons. :)
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by speedbird591 »

Paul K wrote:Ian,..so I am Pathfinder and you are Main Force ?? :lol:
er...yeah :worried:

Ian :lol:

User avatar
Paul K
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 7835
Joined: 12 Jun 2005, 16:41
Location: Norfolk UK

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by Paul K »

Thanks Ben, this is all good info. :)

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by speedbird591 »

Paul. That P3D migration tool looks very good and seems to allow FSX programs to be loaded successfully into P3D. Although it doesn't work if FSX is on the same drive. So I think I'll revert to our (your!) Plan A and try an exclusive P3D install first using that tool if I want to load some FSX scenery. ORBX won't support their FSX scenery in P3D partly because of the installer, partly because of the license and I'm sure I read that there were one or two minor differences. But they are converting them.

If I decide I'd rather go back to FSX until P3D is further developed I can always delete the migration tool before installing anything. I wonder if there is any benefit in partitioning the FS drive to separate the two sims. If they are on D and E drives it wouldn't confuse the installer. What do you think, Ben?

Ian :)

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16759
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by TSR2 »

Hi Ian / Paul. Can't see any great benefit in it either way. I have all three Sims installed on my E drive and have never had a problem. :)
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by speedbird591 »

OK cheers, Ben :)

User avatar
Kevin Farnell
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2083
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:29
Location: Willingham, Cambridge UK.
Contact:

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by Kevin Farnell »

speedbird591 wrote:
Paul K wrote:
I don't think any of the other guys have gone exclusively P3D yet so I'm sure most are running it on the same disk :dunno:
It's worth keeping FSX installed, as P3D is updated at approx 6 month intervals. As (currently), a clean install of P3D is required with each update, migrating some files from FSX (I have encountered some installers that won't install to P3D) makes life a little easier.
That's about the only reason I still have FSX installed. I always fly in P3D.

Regards

Kevin
Stratospheric traces, of our transitory flight.
Trails of condensation, held in narrow paths of white...

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Pacific Fjords

Post by speedbird591 »

Cheers, Kevin, I've come to that conclusion myself now. I've plenty of room so having both seems like the sensible way to go.

Ian :)

Post Reply