Curiosity...

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

Curiosity...

Post by petermcleland »

If you scroll down to the video in this article it looks excellent in Full Screen Mode...the landing is scheduled for August 3rd this year...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18401248

User avatar
Airspeed
The Reds & Concorde
The Reds & Concorde
Posts: 10376
Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
Contact:

Re: Curiosity...

Post by Airspeed »

Well found Peter! :thumbsup:
Let's hope it goes according to plan.
The BBC presentations How to grow a planet, and The making of us have just finished over here.
I hold hope for us as a race. :agree:
Cheers, Mike.
Perspective determines interpretation.
Image

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html

User avatar
FlyTexas
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 7151
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 10:18
Location: Texas

Re: Curiosity...

Post by FlyTexas »

If NASA can pull this one off I'll be truly amazed. Looks sort of like a 'Rube Goldberg' way to land a rover. :lol: Best of luck to 'em! :thumbsup:

Brian

User avatar
speedbird591
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 4038
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 05:56
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Curiosity...

Post by speedbird591 »

Rube Goldberg? If he's the US equivalent of Heath Robinson then I agree with you, Brian. Why not just parachute it down?

If NASA do want my advice, I'd like to point out that there is no air in Space. That means no sound, which seems to have escaped their attention on the video!

I mean, it's not rocket science, is it? Oh, wait...

Ian ;)

User avatar
FlyTexas
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 7151
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 10:18
Location: Texas

Re: Curiosity...

Post by FlyTexas »

speedbird591 wrote:Rube Goldberg? If he's the US equivalent of Heath Robinson...
Yes he is. :agree: I think NASA has been watching too many 'Star Wars' movies, Ian. :lol:

Brian

Vancouver
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1476
Joined: 05 Apr 2008, 00:27
Location: CYXX

Re: Curiosity...

Post by Vancouver »

Oh ye of little faith. Though they do seem to have overcomplicated the landing issue somewhat.
Alex

nigelb
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5039
Joined: 11 Apr 2005, 17:19
Location: Herndon, Virginia, USA

Re: Curiosity...

Post by nigelb »

speedbird591 wrote:
If NASA do want my advice, I'd like to point out that there is no air in Space. That means no sound, which seems to have escaped their attention on the video!

I mean, it's not rocket science, is it? Oh, wait...

Ian ;)
Yes, no air in space but Mars does have an atmosphere so presumably you could hear sound once the vessel is fairly close to the planet.

Nigel²

User avatar
FlyTexas
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 7151
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 10:18
Location: Texas

Re: Curiosity...

Post by FlyTexas »

"In space, no one can hear you scream." – Alien :lol:

Brian

User avatar
Airspeed
The Reds & Concorde
The Reds & Concorde
Posts: 10376
Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
Contact:

Re: Curiosity...

Post by Airspeed »

Yes,
I thought about the sound too.
Decided not to be too picky, it's a bit like railway crossing signs showing non existent steam trains. If they pictured a modern loco, we wouldn't recognise it.
Cheers, Mike.
Perspective determines interpretation.
Image

http://airspeedsflyingvisit.threadwings ... index.html

User avatar
petermcleland
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 5201
Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
Location: Dartmouth, Devon
Contact:

Re: Curiosity...

Post by petermcleland »

Because of the thin atmosphere on Mars, parachutes are not reliable enough to ensure a successful landing...hence the rockets for the last part...It is a really expensive egg to break in the final moments of its arrival :)

Post Reply