CPU thoughts

The place for hardware and software issues, FS and non-FS related

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

ianhind
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1935
Joined: 01 Aug 2005, 10:55
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by ianhind »

Just so that I get this right in my head.. are all those progs designed to utilise the additional cores or is it simply a case of when one gets bogged down.. it passes the baton to the others??
Dave,

IIRC, Photoshop CS3 does use more than one core. The others just use one core so the total use is shared out. And knowing the size of files that my wife produces in these (without complaint :tab: ), it must be all working fine.

Ian

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by DaveB »

Hi Ian :wave:

Tks for that mate. While on the surface, there seems no advantage to dual/quad core (other than the numbers game) I for one have learned otherwise on this thread. Something new learned, another day not wasted :thumbsup: I just wonder which bit of useful info has been pushed out to make way for it :lol:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Chris Sykes
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1658
Joined: 18 Apr 2006, 11:50
Location: Northampton

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by Chris Sykes »

Im going to have to disagree that my FSX wont use more than 2gig... Ive seen my system running at over 6gig in use out of 8gig, that being mostly FSX using it!

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16348
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by TSR2 »

I'd love to see that Chris.... Maybe you could patent it and tell the computing world how you did it :worried:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
JimCooper
Lightning
Lightning
Posts: 296
Joined: 30 Mar 2006, 18:42
Contact:

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by JimCooper »

Reminds me of the scene from Spinal Tap where Nigel explains that his amplifier is loudest because "it goes up to 11"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d54UU-fPIsY

Also reminds me of that old joke:
There are 10 types of people in the world; those that understand binary and those that don't

Jim

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16348
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by TSR2 »

Also reminds me of that old joke:
There are 10 types of people in the world; those that understand binary and those that don't

Jim

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
Chris Sykes
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1658
Joined: 18 Apr 2006, 11:50
Location: Northampton

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by Chris Sykes »

think i just set the .exe to access more than the 2gig it could...

User avatar
spatialpro
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 681
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 20:18
Location: Wessex

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by spatialpro »

Isn't it also a question of your GPU RAM as well? I thought the larger the RAM on your GPU the more it "ate into" (techy term?! :$ ) your regular RAM. For instance, if you have 2Gb RAM and a 1 Gb video card then you could only count on a minimum of 1Gb RAM being available to the application (or OS)?? If this logic is correct then it might be worth having 4+ Gb of RAM on 64-bit OS if you're planning on using a 1Gb or 2Gb GPU, even if the application is 32-bit and can only access 3Gb RAM max.

Feel free to correct me if I'm bonkers... I know you will! :$
Image

Formerly "Airtrooper"

i9-10900KF, 64Gb RAM,
RTX 3090, Quest Pro, Win10 Pro 64-bit
Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals, Saitek X52 Pro

User avatar
Chris Sykes
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1658
Joined: 18 Apr 2006, 11:50
Location: Northampton

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by Chris Sykes »

If you have a GPU then it does take some of your RAM up, i dont know how much, i just know i have normally lots of RAM and lots avaiable for use!

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16348
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: CPU thoughts

Post by TSR2 »

Chris the only way any 32bit app will use 6GB is if it was the paged memory you were looking at? Paged memory is not physical memory but the buffer on the disk where it swaps pages between physical memory and the paged memory
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

Post Reply