Posted a couple of photos' some time ago and today the VC10 was at it again, unfortunately I was just about to take my wife to work so only got one chance as she flew overhead for approach to Waddington. Only problem is is that my camera just does not give the quality that others' on this Forum do unless of course, it is me doing it all wrong!!
Was it Tonks?
Regards
Nigel.
I used to be an optimist but with age I am now a grumpy old pessimist.
They're not too bad given the light mate. I don't know how 'automatic' your digi is but if all else fails.. treat it like a film camera and you'll stand a good chance of getting what you expected.. that is of course unless your last film camera was one of those all-in-one, use-once and return to manufacturer to get the film developed
Many thanks for your kind words of advise and encouragement Dave, Garry. Not a techie with a camera and just tend to point and shoot as I see it.
Many times though an interesting a/c has flown overhead on short finals or passed by, i.e. Lancaster, Spitefire....but by the time I fetch the camera, place the battery inside and switch on it has gone and no matter how much I wait in the hope that it will do some circuits.....It does not re-appear until I have given up and gone inside!! :brick:
Think if they painted the VC10 in brighter colours it would show up better. :think:
Regards
Nigel.
I used to be an optimist but with age I am now a grumpy old pessimist.
Nigel, as others have already stated they are cracking shots from an unusual angle that show lots of great details like the slats. They might not be of printable quality if you were looking for something to hang on your wall however for pictures to browse on a forum they are better than most. There are eleventy-billion almost identical aircraft shots posted on spotters forums each week and they bore me to tears, and all of them are filled with praise for being "perfect". The ones I enjoy browsing are the ones where people have tried to be a little bit different or captured aircraft from interesting angles.
For example, I know a lot of people get irate about airshow photography and carry on something woeful if they get crowds in their shots. I think they've missed a trick and are following some duff "rules for photographers" because the best shots are always those with the crowd, funfair, burger bars, whatever in shot, because the give the photograph context and put it in a distinct time and place, and record the event rather than another snoozeworthy "perfect" shot of a Typhoon that will end up on airliners.net
At the end of the day if you enjoy looking at the results then it's all worth-while.
Looking back through some of my VC10 shots.. I found an almost identical one to that I'd posted 2 years ago.. I think it was the last time the sun came out
Found this one too (also posted at the same time) which in reality is pretty much cr@p but interesting for other reasons. The heat haze has completely distorted the aircraft giving it a Salvadore Dali look (excuse the spelling) and it'd certainly win no prizes for composition or technique I'm not arty-farty enough to go for this effect and it was, like your shot Nigel.. a simple point and shoot.. as were the other thousand I took
I like this sort of shot as it doesn't matter if they're slightly blurred as most of mine are. You'd not be able to make this clear if you tried!