Carrier deal signed

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
forthbridge
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1595
Joined: 29 Aug 2007, 13:26
Location: Stirlingshire, UK

Carrier deal signed

Post by forthbridge »

From Auntie:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7486683.stm

Will there be airworthy Harriers left by the time they are built??
Jim
Image

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by DaveB »

Doesn't really matter Jim as they're designed to carry the JSF :rock:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
forthbridge
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1595
Joined: 29 Aug 2007, 13:26
Location: Stirlingshire, UK

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by forthbridge »

Are the beeb wrong again saying they will carry Harriers until JSF is ready?
Jim
Image

User avatar
Trev Clark
The Ministry
Posts: 2822
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 08:54
Location: Runway 26 at RAF Tangmere....most Mondays!

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by Trev Clark »

Despite it being about 5 (for that read 8 ) years before they enter service, it seems the JSF's will not be ready! :lol:

I have said it before, when (often British) aircraft were designed with pencil, paper and a slide rule, they were built, test flown, entered service, found to be not as good as was hoped, so become obsolete and then scrapped in the time it take a modern aircraft to leave the computer screen! :brick: :brick: :brick:

I know this will upset some ex-naval members here, but if these things ever get into the water, I will eat my sombrero!!!
ATB Trev

Hot_Charlie
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1018
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 23:51
Location: Bomber County

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by Hot_Charlie »

DaveB wrote:Doesn't really matter Jim as they're designed to carry the JSF :rock:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
Can't help thinking they'd have been better waiting to see a "real" F-35 delivery (to anyone) before signing the deal.

Hey-ho. It'll keep the Navy happy. The fact we have concrete (and tarmac) bases in both our current main theatres is neither here nor there I suppose.
Charlie

[Intentionally Blank]

SkippyBing
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1460
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 18:21

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by SkippyBing »

The fact we have concrete (and tarmac) bases in both our current main theatres is neither here nor there I suppose.
Only if you're planning on only playing there for the next fifty odd years. Still think they should be built with cats and traps though to mitigate against problems with the F-35, oh and get a decent AWACS, tanker, Electronic Warfare.....
Image

User avatar
forthbridge
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1595
Joined: 29 Aug 2007, 13:26
Location: Stirlingshire, UK

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by forthbridge »

Dunno what the plans are for the Rosyth work, but it will be interesting to see whetever emerges getting squeezed under the bridges :o

IIRC about 150ft is the clearance.. Not sure what height the current carriers are, but they can't be too far off that, so goodness knows what height the new ones will be....
Jim
Image

User avatar
Trev Clark
The Ministry
Posts: 2822
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 08:54
Location: Runway 26 at RAF Tangmere....most Mondays!

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by Trev Clark »

On the lunchtime news I saw the defence secretary doing PR at the shipyard at Govern on the Clyde where a lot of work is going to happen for these carriers........it was no suprise to me that he was a Scot :lol: On the flipside the ship will be part built and based in Portsmouth, I wonder how that slipped through the current cabinet who 'lean toward the tartan a wee bit'!
ATB Trev

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by Garry Russell »

The Government do seem to be trying to tartan up their image North of the border :)

Garry
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
jonesey2k
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2613
Joined: 13 Aug 2004, 13:59
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Re: Carrier deal signed

Post by jonesey2k »

Navalised Typhoon ftw :)

I'm still in intrigued by the decision to go non-nuclear. It seems to me a bit odd as the only people we look even remotely like fighting in the future are also giving us oil...
Error 482: Somebody shot the server with a 12 gauge.

Post Reply