ChrisHunt wrote:Good point Michael. I'm considering deleting this one and getting a refund. Had another go last night and given the price there are just too many issues with the FM to persevier. Still I can use the money for something else so every cloud etc etc.
Unless of course one of our very own gurus can do something with it?
Regards,
Chris
I think the biggest ( I was going to say mistake but its not a mistake per se' ) draw back is that they have crammed too much into one product, there are too may variables between Mks for one FDE to become effective, it is very easy to get drawn into the must add more to the package to make it more appealing, the end result is a massive work load in making sure each version is just so and each cockpit matches each exterior and all the variable load outs as well.
I cannot knock it as I've done it myself in the past with the Seaking, you think its your only chance to add all those fringe variants when in reality joe public only wanted a RAF SAR and a USN variant, it takes great discipline to stop overloading a project.
If they had stuck to one RAF variant it might have been easier to bend MS Flight sim into accepting a swing wing transonic aircraft, a swing wing is the worst of all worlds, in one form its a plank winged sub sonic turn and burn, the next a delta punching great big holes in clouds at high speed. Matching real world numbers for even a large proportion of the envelope probably isnt going to happen veary easily or even at all.
Best
Michael
The only model in the expansion pack I'm particularly interested in is the clean one, for display flying. But I can't justify an extra tenner just so I can have the missiles removed from the Italian model... the base pack was hardly cheap in the first place.
