XR219 wrote:Tweek,
my point on the Captainsim 757 is I paid for an FSX version, that is no more than the FS9 version with a thumbnail and that pisses me off. Why not use "FSX compatible" in the description? ... I can tell you, lazyness and greed. They couldn't be arsed making an FSX version when for no cost they can sell the FS9 version and stick an FSX "sticker" on it. Thats completely against any trades descriptions. At least the Alphasim stuff IS FSX optomised.
Sorry, I wasn't referring to your point as such, rather that of what Rick was saying about certain individuals who were giving him grief for 'abandoning' FS9. Some people do get so up their own arses that they can't seem to understand why they're not getting what they want, not at all respecting the wishes of a developer who may want to persue a different route - in this particular case, moving on from FS9 to FSX. Nobody has a right to have models for their particular sim, be it FS9, FSX, or FS5.
However, I do agree with your point. There's no excuse for payware companies simply slapping an FSX tag onto a ready made FS9 model, and selling it as something new. If I'm
paying for an FSX model, then I want an FSX model, not some repackaged FS9 one which gives me 10fps and none of the extra features that FSX brings.
But of course, those two issues are entirely different kettles of fish. ;-)