AS B-24 first pics...

[Trev Clark]

I know it is not British, but is is pretty classic. I hope some RAF schemes are planned too. It looks pretty mean!

[Garry Russell]

Looks like FS.X from the finish....bump mapping???

Garry

[SkippyBing]

That is the FSX version, I believe an FS9 version is also on the cards, but with out some of the extra features obviously.

[Garry Russell]

The rivits are sure impressive of the Stork

Garry

[DaveB]

Doesn't work for me sadly. Not sure if it's AS or FSX to blame.. I fear a combination of both

DaveB :tab:

[Quixoticish]

Certainly ticks all of my boxes, I think this one will be a keeper. Sheesh, between the Tornado, Jaguar, B-24, C-17, Alphasim are going to be costing me a lot of money in the not too distant future!

[Chris Trott]

Yep, definitely getting this one.

I'm just glad I don't have to be the one to let those guys know that they got the prop weathering wrong. I just hope they got the pitch and rotation on the model right because that'd just be a travesty.

[Paul K]

Was over the moon, and still am...but I've queried the shape of the forward fuselage. I really want this to be good for Alphasim, because if its a big success, they may do more Allied heavies, and that will suit me nicely.

It might be the angle of the screenshots thats the problem.

[d0mokun]

Yep, definitely getting this one.

I'm just glad I don't have to be the one to let those guys know that they got the prop weathering wrong. I just hope they got the pitch and rotation on the model right because that'd just be a travesty.

Lol Chris, it'd be a "travesty".. yet you weren't going to send a simple PM to let me know of the issue? I can't sort it if I don't know about it!

Luckily, someone DID mention it. That and the slight fuselage shape error have both been corrected.

Hey, I don't bite. Phil might but I don't. Please remember that in the future.

BR
Dan.

[Chris Trott]

Dan, I didn't send the PM because by the time I saw it, someone else had already pointed it out, so I figured it'd get fixed. I did say that in the second sentence of my first post.