DUO or QUAD?

The place for hardware and software issues, FS and non-FS related

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
PeteH
Viscount
Viscount
Posts: 104
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 12:35
Location: Norfolk

DUO or QUAD?

Post by PeteH »

Advice please.

What is the best option on a system that will primarily be used to run FS9/FSX? I am struggling trying to understand how these multiple core processors work beyond the fact that they share the work. Would a Quad Core be an unnecessary sophistication on a system that will not be running, for instance, any business applications.

The choice would be between a DUO E6550 and a QUAD Q6600 . Bearing in mind the price difference would I be better off with the DUO and 2 Gigs extra memory?

Thanks.

Pete
Thinking does not necessarily make it so.

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16345
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by TSR2 »

What is the price difference Pete? Quad will be better on FSX, but no difference on FS9.
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
PeteH
Viscount
Viscount
Posts: 104
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 12:35
Location: Norfolk

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by PeteH »

The difference is £60.

Not sure if I am going to FSX yet but as it's a possibility at some time I guess QUAD is the way to go.

Still not clear though. Would a 2.33GHz DUO or QUAD be better or worse in FS9 than a 2.6GHz P4?

Pete
Thinking does not necessarily make it so.

User avatar
Techy111
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3319
Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 13:51
Location: Coming out of Retirement.

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by Techy111 »

Pete i have a E6750 and they are dirt cheap at the moment....

If its primarily for FS9 well i get 60 to 70 FPS all sliders maxed even in the busiest of areas and am happy with it...

FSX though is a pig.....Why...? Ask Dave..... :lol:

Go for a Duo as the driver database for quad core machines is a bit thin on the ground still...

But if its the future your also looking at then Quad could be your answer....

I had a 3.06Ghz HT chip before and i thought that was OK....I have problems at the moment with my machine but thats totally down to the idiot trying to use it.... :cpu:

My opinion only Pete....

Tony
The last surviving and complete Vickers Vanguard....."Superb"
ImageImageImage

SkippyBing
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1460
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 18:21

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by SkippyBing »

Would a Quad Core be an unnecessary sophistication on a system that will not be running, for instance, any business applications.
A Quad Core would be an unnecessary sophistication on a system that will be running business applications, unless your business is video editing or something like that.
Image

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by DanKH »

XR219 wrote:...Quad will be better on FSX, but no difference on FS9.
Exactly my words.
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

User avatar
PeteH
Viscount
Viscount
Posts: 104
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 12:35
Location: Norfolk

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by PeteH »

Thanks guys.

I think the mists are now begining to clear and I have a better idea of what will fit my requirements.

Pete
Thinking does not necessarily make it so.

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16345
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by TSR2 »

Techy111 wrote: Go for a Duo as the driver database for quad core machines is a bit thin on the ground still...
Tony

Tony, don't know what your on about mate, there is no difference for drivers for single, dual, quad or 8 way machines, the drivers are all the same. Only difference is x64 OS or x32 OS, and thats not being discussed. ;-)
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by DaveB »

I wish more folk would ask questions like this as I too have lost the plot with chip numbers.. motherboard chipsets.. in fact, the whole shebang :roll:

Lee, my assistant manager, recently bought a mobo bundle from Novatech. Can't remember the exact flavour of mobo but it was an Asus running an Nvidia Nforce6 chipset. The CPU is an intel Core2Duo 3gig and he has 2gig of onboard ram and an Nvidia 700mb graphics card. FS9 goes like something off a shovel as does FSX though like many of us here.. he doesn't use FSX much. He runs WinXP SP2 btw.

I saw an intel quad 2.2ghz on ebuyer going for £150 this last Sunday which I thought was a giveaway. Are Core2Duo's much cheaper??

ATB

DaveB :tab:
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Techy111
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3319
Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 13:51
Location: Coming out of Retirement.

Re: DUO or QUAD?

Post by Techy111 »

XR219 wrote: Only difference is x64 OS or x32 OS, and thats not being discussed. ;-)
Sorry mate....getting sidetracked there.....yes its the 64bit that has the driver issue isn't it....?

Sorry for any confusion...

Dave i got my E6750 for £113 and am well chuffed with it....good O/C potential also...

Tony
The last surviving and complete Vickers Vanguard....."Superb"
ImageImageImage

Post Reply