FSX SP1 Out Now..............

If you have a payware prog whether it be a model, scenery or utility that you have tried.. tell us about it here.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16345
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Post by TSR2 »

Truth is Dan, I'm getting old and the pub is becoming a bad place... must remember that I'm not 21 anymore. :lol: :lol:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

Who is nowadays? :lol:
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

snave

Post by snave »

FSX is the future.
Just not the present.

FS9 is the past
Just not yet.


I'm a stickler for `equivalency` - in order for an upgrade to be worthwhile there has to be sufficient information that the new thing will do what the old thing will do. Only better. So the starting point for a `new'un` is to ask it to do the same job as the `old'un` - and see if it does it more efficiently, faster, better, or whatever critieria you apply.

Until now, FSX failed that test - on equivalent settings I got much less smoothness, never mind fps - and that indefinable `feeling of flying` in FS9 was superior.

But I have to say that SP1, for me, tips the balance. Maybe...

I'm not really fussed as its DX10 and NEXT year that I bought FSX for - I have a hardware upgrade planned for late this year, so I can probably get at least another nine months out of FS9. But there are things in FSX that FS9 cannot match.

User avatar
DanKH
Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain
Posts: 3526
Joined: 02 Dec 2004, 10:53
Location: EKCH, Denmark
Contact:

Post by DanKH »

snave wrote:Until now, FSX failed that test - on equivalent settings
Please bear in mind, that the same slideposition in FSX is NOT the same slideposition in FS9, a point that has been stated quite a lot from ACES/M$

Just a comment, not to mix things up :smile:
Best Rgds
Dan
Image
Image Image
Who's General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?

kit
Trident
Trident
Posts: 333
Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:55
Location: Forest of Dean

Post by kit »

snave wrote: I'm a stickler for `equivalency` - in order for an upgrade to be worthwhile there has to be sufficient information that the new thing will do what the old thing will do. Only better.
Bill Gates should have that writ large on a plaque on his desk!

The number of M$ products that WON'T do what the previous version did is legion......... :tuttut:
Regards
Kit

Post Reply