Something catching the sun...
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
-
- Chipmunk
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 06 Dec 2005, 18:55
- Location: Deployed
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
- Chris Trott
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 05:16
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
C-137 = 707-320. There was no difference between the two except avionics fit.Garry Russell wrote:No James
It's built as military so it would be based on a C-137.......707's are airliners
Garry
In fact, I do believe that all of the RAF E-3s were converted from formerly civilian registered and operated aircraft, just like the USAF's aircraft. There were only a very small handfull of aircraft delivered as C-137s from the factory, and most were in the VC-137 guise for several countries in addition to the famous pair that saw service as "Air Force One".
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
The two VC-137C (26000 and 27000) were based on the 707-320.
http://www.707sim.com/air-force-two.html
The earlier 86970 thru 86973 (fiscal year 1958) were apparently based on the 707-120,so shorter fuselage.
They were frequent visitors to Heathrow in the 1970/80s. They must have been Air Force One in those days before the VC-137C.
Whole range of military Boeing 707 variants here:
http://www.air-and-space.com/Boeing%207 ... litary.htm
As Garry says all the E-3 were new builds.
It is the other variants that were ex airliners.
http://www.707sim.com/air-force-two.html
The earlier 86970 thru 86973 (fiscal year 1958) were apparently based on the 707-120,so shorter fuselage.
They were frequent visitors to Heathrow in the 1970/80s. They must have been Air Force One in those days before the VC-137C.
Whole range of military Boeing 707 variants here:
http://www.air-and-space.com/Boeing%207 ... litary.htm
As Garry says all the E-3 were new builds.
It is the other variants that were ex airliners.
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Cheers Ian
The point I was originally making as well about E-3 being based on the C137 military version was to differentiate from the C-135 which some folk think the E-3 is based on.
The 707 had a wider fuse than the C-135 which used the same basic fuse of the 367-80.
These were some of the few 707 derivatives built with the CFM-56 making the closest 707 variant the 700 rather than the 320 which the base C-137 was a version of. Of course the E-3 was not at all like the airliner apart from the base structure.
This must surely make the RAF built ones among the most advanced of the type....as built.
Garry
The point I was originally making as well about E-3 being based on the C137 military version was to differentiate from the C-135 which some folk think the E-3 is based on.
The 707 had a wider fuse than the C-135 which used the same basic fuse of the 367-80.
These were some of the few 707 derivatives built with the CFM-56 making the closest 707 variant the 700 rather than the 320 which the base C-137 was a version of. Of course the E-3 was not at all like the airliner apart from the base structure.
This must surely make the RAF built ones among the most advanced of the type....as built.
Garry
Garry

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
How about the French ones?Robin wrote:Aren't we the only air force to have the refuelling probe on the E3?
L'Armee de l'Air have KC-135 tankers with short hoses and drogues trailing off the end of the booms as I recall. Originally set up to fuel the Mirage IVs but work also on the 2000Ds and Ns.
Regards
Kit
Kit
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall