Page 1 of 1
Saw an interesting thread on this today...
Posted: 18 Dec 2006, 14:34
by petermcleland
Someone seems to have found a way to stream Google Earth imagery into FSX...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/71882461@N ... 5533/show/ Oahu
http://www.flickr.com/photos/71882461@N ... 0685/show/ Grand Canyon
http://www.flickr.com/photos/71882461@N ... 2755/show/ San Diego
Don't ask me how it was done...but it looks great :dance:
Posted: 18 Dec 2006, 14:38
by Garry Russell
There was this thread a short time ago
I read up on it and it was taking an hour to load FS :shock:
http://www.cbfsim.org/cbfsimv5/cbfsbb/v ... php?t=8163
Nice though
Garry
Posted: 18 Dec 2006, 16:19
by LeeC
Impressive stuff! :shock:
Personally still sticking with FS9 ATM, however it does show the vast flexibility of FSX and what could be in years to come. Perhaps if these tiles were (legally) cached locally, there wouldn't be a need to keep streaming them in realtime and loading times will be gradually reduced as you fly/map the earth. :think:
Best,
Lee
Posted: 18 Dec 2006, 16:21
by Garry Russell
This in itself has limitation buy it does show it can be done
So it is a start....a proof of concept and it can only be a matter of time before this sort of thing becomes the way to go.
Garry
Posted: 18 Dec 2006, 17:40
by jonesey2k
Depends, not all areas have high resolution coverage.
Posted: 18 Dec 2006, 20:06
by Garry Russell
Not yet but a year or so when this starts to become more of the way that will improve.
It may be some other source rather than Google......
Like I said it's just the beginning
Garry
Posted: 19 Dec 2006, 01:38
by TSR2
Interesting as MS have a pretty decent mapping site of their own in local.live.com. In some area's its better than google, in some its worse, but if there was some way of properly caching it in FSX then that would go a long way to enticing some folk to buy it.
Posted: 19 Dec 2006, 01:43
by Garry Russell
One thing it will need to be matched...
There are too many areas equal in resolution but not in quality and taken at a different times
But the fact it does exist and can be done is all that really matters :dance:
Details can be addressed and a way to make it practical can be found...just a case of getting on to it.
Even if it is not feasible at this time .....it is possible :think:
Garry
Re: Saw an interesting thread on this today...
Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 02:55
by Macs
I had seen another thread a few weeks ago about this. Anyway, great idea me thinks

regards,
'Macs

Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 09:11
by Garry Russell
Hi Macs
I posted the other thread above if your intersted
Garry