Page 1 of 1

An apology to Dave Garwood

Posted: 18 Dec 2012, 20:41
by Paul K
I've been doing some circuits in the Mosquito this evening, getting used to its performance, different flap settings and so on. Thoroughly enjoyed myself too; its a model of a very high powered aircraft, but doesn't overwhelm or intimidate. Very 'comfortable' to fly, if you know what I mean. It must have taken an enormous amount of work.

Which brings me to my apology. I must admit I did get a bit of a bee in my bonnet about the nose. I went on a bit about it, didn't I ? A more rounded nose...pfft...how could that possibly be ? Well, I tried looking at a few more photos and eventually found out. You are right and I am miserably wrong, and how could it be any other way ?

Dave G, I humbly apologise for being a pain in the arse on the matter.

Paul Kirkland

Re: An apology to Dave Garwood

Posted: 18 Dec 2012, 22:16
by DaveG
Hi Paul,

No apology is needed.
There were so many variations in all parts of the Mosquito across different marks and sub-types that it's easy to get lost as to which is which. Believe me I know :lol:
No model is perfect, and I know the nose is one area that could be improved.

:thumbsup:

Re: An apology to Dave Garwood

Posted: 18 Dec 2012, 22:33
by Garry Russell
TBH, it's nice to know that folk look at the models so closely :) . Models such as this are indeed a thing of beauty and not something to half look at with partially closed eyes. :lol: .

Sometimes, queries like this can bring to the fore many subtle differences in sub types as one seeks to check out making it, at times, quite an educational investigation :)

Re: An apology to Dave Garwood

Posted: 19 Dec 2012, 06:03
by Paul K
Thank you Dave, very gracious of you. :cheers:

Yes Garry, it certainly is a thing of beauty. :)