Page 1 of 2

Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 15:53
by NigelC
Going to buy FSX :OB:

This might sound daft, but Standard, Deluxe, Gold, Acceleration etc etc.

Which one gents?

Nigel

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 16:16
by Effoh
Hi Nigel,

Gold gives you the Deluxe and the Acceleration Pack, which brings you slap up to date with SP2 and all the bells...currently £19.97 at Amazon.

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 16:23
by DaveB
Yup.. there IS only one choice and that Amazon offer is IT :thumbsup:

Be prepared for some anguish and the UK looking like nowhere you've ever been to before :lol:

ATB

DaveB B)smk

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 16:53
by Effoh
Especially around Baldock!! :lol:

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 19:45
by Nigel H-J
Nigel, don't forget your survival pack to ensure smooth installation of aircraft and sceneries.

Anti-Depressants: for those periods when you're either going to throw the computer out of the window.....or yourself!! :worried:

Aspirin: for when you keep banging your :wall: during peak frustrations!! :doh:

Alcohol: For when you either triumph with no glitches and want to celebrate your achievement......or obliterate yourself to forget your frustrations. :party:

Nigel.

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 19:57
by TSR2
Nigel, you'll love it :)

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 20:15
by DanKH
I second Bens remarks :-)

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 23:54
by NigelC
Gold duly ordered from Amazon

Many thanks guys

Nigel

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 11:18
by speedbird591
Ben Watson wrote:Nigel, you'll love it :)
Yes. It's definitely the way forward. Whereas the basic, default interface is more 'arcade' than 'simulator' it's the expansion potential that makes it work. FS9 has probably been stretched to the limit but FSX provides a very powerful baseline for increasingly realistic add-ons. But that does mean a lot of extra expense in the form of scenery add-ons to get the benefit of it. And then there's the need for a powerful PC to run it effectively - so it's not a cheap option.

I installed it recently on my laptop, despite Ben's reservations :lol: , and after a lot of fiddling got better frame rates in FSX than in FS9 for similar graphics quality. And of course FSX runs more smoothly than FS9 at the same fps so I was pretty happy.

Unfortunately, that didn't last! It had all gone so well that I was having a strange feeling of optimism (which sadly turned out to be indigestion). On a wave of euphoria I bought the Captain Sim FSX 757 because I like flying it in FS9 and because it was cheap(ish). Disaster! Frame rates of 1.0 to 1.5 at UK2000 LHR :rofl:

So - off it came but it had wreaked havoc with both the FSX and, somehow, with the FS9 installations! I don't know what it's done but I struggle to get 7 fps with the VC10 in FS9 at KaiTak, which won't do at all.

I did have this happen once before and it involved a re-install of Windows, but I'm not in the mood to do that now I've upgraded to W7. So, I either do that and stick with FS9, spend upwards of £1,000 on a desktop and add-ons just to run FSX or give up flight simming completely and go back to being a male underwear model :S

Moral of the story: FSX is the future, but it ain't cheap!

Dunno where I go from here.

Ian :dunno:

Re: Stupid Question Time

Posted: 07 Feb 2010, 11:41
by DaveB
:lol: :lol: :lol:

After reading that, I'd be a candidate for modelling incontinence underwear :lol:

ATB

DaveB B)smk