Page 1 of 3

Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 22:18
by Nigel Edwards
Image

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 22:20
by TSR2
Thats smashing Nigel!!! One of my favourite Nimrod paints :thumbsup:

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 22:22
by Garry Russell
Very atmospheric B)smk

Nice one Nigel :)

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 22:40
by VEGAS
Wow Nige. Love it mate. Great one!! ;)

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 22:48
by Garry Russell
The R1's are finished now

One retired two about to be AFAIK....all to be preserved :)

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 23:49
by Sl4yer
Garry Russell wrote:The R1's are finished now

One retired two about to be AFAIK....all to be preserved :)
That's very sad news. There was no mention of this at Waddington last year, and makes one wonder what is wrong with the airframes when there appears to be no replacement ready.

James

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 23:51
by TSR2
Surely the Sentinel is replacing the Nimrod R1's?

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 23:55
by Sl4yer
Not according to the RAF's website anyway. The Sentinel seems to have a more tactical role, and the R1 a more, well, secret role!

The Sentinel take-off on Saturday morning at Waddington last year was amazing though! Straight up into a tight spiral - an extremely overpowered aircraft.

James

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 23 Jan 2010, 00:02
by TSR2
Don't think there will be much more in the way of the UK doing its own sneaky beaky function. We can't justify the costs I'd have thought. :dunno:

Re: Goodbye old girl

Posted: 23 Jan 2010, 00:39
by Garry Russell
I forget where I read it but the article said the RAF will have to make do with a gap until the replacement comes on stream in a few years.

Doesn't sound a good way of doing things as either it's needed or not.......so why a gap??