The hardest decision to make on a computer.
Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 09:53
when to upgrade and when to move on to bliss of smelling new electronics burning in for the first few days of a new one.
my question
What could I upgrade to get say 30 % increase or more in performance
My current PC is a Gateway GT5016E
http://support.gateway.com/s/PC/R/GTMod ... 7sp2.shtml
It’s a dual core 2.8 Ghz 820
800 FSB
945 chipset
775 socket
4 gig of PC4200 533mhz DDR2 SDRAM
Nvidia 8600GT 512mb DDR2 800mhz ram
300 watt power supply
Plus it has XP Media Center with a tv capture card …../ remote
I’ve seen 3ghz dual core processors that are 940 instead of 820
Does that matter if they are both 775 sockets?
And would a power supply help…. maybe a 600 watt?
A budget of around 200 US is about all I want to spend on this machine. As It has almost two years one her
So do I upgrade or leave it for what it is and buy a new one
The new quad core machines are running on average 1.8 to 2.2 Ghz speed
Since MSFS is run through only one processor by default (although there is a patch to get it running on both)
Would the faster dual core 3.0 machines be a better choice, keeping in mind FS9 will be it’s main job?
Hope ya’ll can help.
Joe
my question
What could I upgrade to get say 30 % increase or more in performance
My current PC is a Gateway GT5016E
http://support.gateway.com/s/PC/R/GTMod ... 7sp2.shtml
It’s a dual core 2.8 Ghz 820
800 FSB
945 chipset
775 socket
4 gig of PC4200 533mhz DDR2 SDRAM
Nvidia 8600GT 512mb DDR2 800mhz ram
300 watt power supply

Plus it has XP Media Center with a tv capture card …../ remote
I’ve seen 3ghz dual core processors that are 940 instead of 820
Does that matter if they are both 775 sockets?
And would a power supply help…. maybe a 600 watt?
A budget of around 200 US is about all I want to spend on this machine. As It has almost two years one her
So do I upgrade or leave it for what it is and buy a new one
The new quad core machines are running on average 1.8 to 2.2 Ghz speed
Since MSFS is run through only one processor by default (although there is a patch to get it running on both)
Would the faster dual core 3.0 machines be a better choice, keeping in mind FS9 will be it’s main job?
Hope ya’ll can help.
Joe