Re: Meteor F.8/FR.9
Posted: 13 Oct 2016, 22:21
I agree with Henk and Dave on a variety of points. I love the Meteor, but there were some issues when released. The SP1 resolved the texture and external lighting issues. Since then I discovered the scripting for additional external fuel, and an SOH member posted scripting for additional VC lighting.
The generator issue should have been addressed as part of the beta testing IMHO. It is the same problem with the JF Hawk when first released, and later fixed with a SP.
I have many JF and AH products for FSX and FS9. Over time I get the distinct impression that each product has a different designer, and changes in design approach which makes it interesting when they attempt to create products to fit different platforms (e.g., FSX, FSX-SE, P3D, etc.). As them attempt to be innovative and improve the next product, these issues will surface. I have the highest regard for their talent and efforts, but I do wish those "beta testers" would test the product the way I fly 'em and use a checklist to evaluate some of these "minor items" that reach production.
Okay, back to tea time.
--WH
The generator issue should have been addressed as part of the beta testing IMHO. It is the same problem with the JF Hawk when first released, and later fixed with a SP.
I have many JF and AH products for FSX and FS9. Over time I get the distinct impression that each product has a different designer, and changes in design approach which makes it interesting when they attempt to create products to fit different platforms (e.g., FSX, FSX-SE, P3D, etc.). As them attempt to be innovative and improve the next product, these issues will surface. I have the highest regard for their talent and efforts, but I do wish those "beta testers" would test the product the way I fly 'em and use a checklist to evaluate some of these "minor items" that reach production.
Okay, back to tea time.

--WH