J0hn wrote:
Anyway, I may not be describing it as well as I'd like, but I hope you understand my meaning (and it's just the BEA paint I'm talking of). If you look at the fin in that screenshot on your website, that is the best example, I think.
Thanks for 'listening'.

Hi JD. I hear what you're saying, and I've heard this now from others (although as usual I have to mention we've also now had several comments from users about how nicely it's done, too!) It may be a shading thing, as you say, and perhaps I'll see what I can do, but I'm beginning to think that perhaps the main problem, for those that don't own the Heron, is the lack of close-up screenshots that would show the skin detail. Perhaps smaller monitors will also make the detail hard to see (I'm looking into a 25" screen here, fairly large). I think it will be a good idea to add some of those to the screenshotpage on the FR website. I actually find the rivets a tad overdone, as they are the same size in both the external and VC, and if you sit in a passenger seat and look out over the wing, the rivets are just a little exaggerated (and dark, but otherwise they're too hard to see with just bump mapping).
Another thing that was difficult, incidentally, on the bare-metal schemes, is that De Havilland appears to have used aluminium (Birmabright? ) that was the same 'colour' over the entire skin, no variations in tone or reflectivity, or discolouration, as one finds on bare-metal B-17's and the like, and I have to say that looks somewhat strange in the sim - but that's what the photos appear to show, and so we stuck with it. But I think it looks peculiar in FSX if you're used to WWII aircraft, etc..
Once we get the VA landing lights to behave (hopefully today), I'll review the website screenshots, and also have a look at the shadowing on the exterior models. Stay tuned!
Mike