Finally having had to time to read through the thread, there are a couple of comments about the colour for BEA being incorrect. Would anyone have an authenticated RGB value for whatever colours you think could be better? I'm just curious, as a lot of time was spent sampling colour photos of the BEA Herons (especially at Barra), taken at different times with different cameras, running them through corrective filters, etc., before settling on what you have in the package. From the warm creamy-gray of the undersides (used on other Herons, too, in different airlines at that time, which makes me think it might have a been a De Havilland factory colour at that point), to the red and blue, they seem to correspond to all the photo evidence at hand. We even sampled BEA brochures from 1973. The only difference I could note was that as the blue aged slightly, it lost a bit of it's shine (didn't fade), and that slightly more matt colour tends to reflect more light and thus look lighter at certain angles. But if anyone has proven values, they would be very good to have, as it would be nice to be absolutely authentic in the future.
Also, a small comment about the appearance of the model. Some find it lacking a little "life", etc.. I actually tend to agree! But once we had made the rivets and panel lines to scale (as much as possible), and zoomed out the viewpoint, those details tend to become less visible. They should there if you get closer, however. Even the little water outlets on the fuselage are there. Skin bowing on the upper wing surfaces is there. They do appear match what could be seen on the great majority of Heron photos, at least to the best of my photo interpretation abilities. Personally, I am not a fan of exaggerated, comic book panel lines, rivets, dirt and the like, even though it does give a certain character and they appear often in FSX. There is dirt and grime there on and in the model, but matched as closely as possible to the real Herons when in oparational service (have a look at the cockpit floor, control columns, etc.). They seem to have been very clean aircraft, and kept so, and left almost no oil and exhaust stains. They don't appear to have chipped much, even around high use areas such as the baggage doors or engine cowls, either. The result is a pretty clean, almost "model" like appearance, and because it appeared to be as accurate as we could make it, decided to keep it so (no matter the commments we knew we'd get

). That said, there IS always more to learn, and your feedback helps a lot.
Hope you don't mind my comments! Ok, now it's back to getting the VA landing light to work as it should....
Mike