Page 3 of 5
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 19:34
by Garry Russell
It sure is Ian
I don't recall that when I downloaded so perhaps is a later addition
Garry
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 20:04
by ianhind
The BN-2T is on the site but there is no download.
Ian
Edit: I have found PHRPM31.zip dated September 2003 on a CD so there was an earlier version.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 20:45
by Garry Russell
Ah.I've not tried it yet.........but it's not there?
Hmm
Ahhhh......
?
Garry
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 20:53
by AndyG
ianhind wrote:
The BN-2T is on the site but there is no download.
Ian
Edit: I have found PHRPM31.zip dated September 2003 on a CD so there was an earlier version.
You can pick the BN-2T up at Avsim. The file is called "turbine_islander.zip"; well. what else could you call it!
AndyG
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 23:15
by biplaneflyer
Never knew that was their! Had presumed because no link on his site he had never realeased it! However something makes me wonder if this is a bona fide release? -considering the read-me in this zip and lack of downloadable model from his site.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 23:40
by ianhind
However something makes me wonder if this is a bona fide release?
The version on Avsim is the same as I have stored on a CD but in a different paint scheme. So it is version 3.1. All the others have been upgraded to version 3.2.
Ian
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 01:18
by phantom_fgr2
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 18:13
by DaveB
Jonbouy,
Does that Lydd scheme fit the new model??
I found myself spending a couple of hours mastering it's odd characteristics today. Full of fuel and with the default payload, it handles more like a flying brick than an aircraft but cutting the fuel down and shaving a ton off the payload see's a totally different model. Throttle response under flaps is the exact opposite to what you'd expect.. nose down on throttle increase.. nose up when backing off but with a little trim, you can squeeze it down into some rather small places and grease the landing t'boot
I've noticed it shaking itself all over the place although this seems to be more noticeable from the outside than the inside :shock: The 2D doesn't look as sharp as the VC (odd) and may not be what one would consider cutting edge but I reckon he's not changed it a great deal if any over the v1 (it doesn't look very developed). Regardless.. if I can find enough paints for it, the model warrants being a keeper. It's SO odd you just have to like it
Wish I felt the same about its smaller brother though :sad:
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 18:22
by Garry Russell
Hi Dave
My 2D is very sharp and a lot sharper then the VC
I wonder if something misfired there :think:
Garry
Posted: 14 Sep 2006, 18:24
by DaveB
Dunno mate :think: It's not so much that the 2D is blurred, more that the gauges look sharper in VC. Could well be my eyes!!
ATB
DaveB :tab:
I've noticed it shaking itself all over the place although this seems to be more noticeable from the outside than the inside :shock: The 2D doesn't look as sharp as the VC (odd) and may not be what one would consider cutting edge but I reckon he's not changed it a great deal if any over the v1 (it doesn't look very developed). Regardless.. if I can find enough paints for it, the model warrants being a keeper. It's SO odd you just have to like it