Page 3 of 3
Posted: 13 May 2006, 11:25
by Rick Piper
Hi Dave G
I don't think your comment was bad.
I have a similar view.
The only way to make it more real is to keep pushing the models out to a higher degree.
I tried other Flightsims but FS9 is good for me and i like it.
it has lots of bugs but i can't see anyone else making a better one soon.
Regards
Rick
Posted: 13 May 2006, 11:31
by andy
Posted: 13 May 2006, 11:47
by Dyl Roberts
DispatchDragon wrote:Sorry to pee on folks parade - put they just look like high end fs9 screenines to me - seen better done by our own members (Im sure FSX will be a thing
of wonder and 75 bucks out of my pocket when delivered for not much more)
Sorry didnt mean to be an old sore head
Leif
I Agree with you on that point Leif, but I also agree with Dave too, they are better than the current default textures offering
Posted: 13 May 2006, 13:03
by Erich
Guys, I meant no offense by my remarks either. I don't think FSX is the bees knees quite yet. I just can't undertand all the negativity at a 1 min presentation. Afterall, we all want the same end result.
Erich
Posted: 13 May 2006, 13:16
by airboatr
awwwww
everybodys so
:goodman:
:crying:
I love these lil smile thingys they're Hilarious
Exspecially this Happy camper >>>>>>>>>>> :yipeee:
Posted: 13 May 2006, 13:35
by Erich
Posted: 13 May 2006, 14:42
by britishtourer
I think this looks fantastic! It will give us really good scenery which is what FS has been needing!
It's also great that there's backwards compatiblity.
