Microsoft Flight Discontinued

If you have a payware prog whether it be a model, scenery or utility that you have tried.. tell us about it here.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by Garry Russell »

:lol: :lol: :lol: *-) :dunno: :-#
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
airboatr
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 6839
Joined: 25 Oct 2007, 07:17

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by airboatr »

TSR2 wrote: I'm sure someone here said that they had paid for the Developer version,
Rick Piper.
:)

But, he said he wasn't going to continue. Or was thinking of discontinuing it.
:dunno:

SkippyBing
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 1460
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 18:21

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by SkippyBing »

I've got the developer license and to be honest apart from the ability to put a copy on two separate machines I don't really see any advantage as the SDK is free anyway, so after 5 months or so I'd have been better off getting the academic licence.
I don't know if there are any legalities involved if you make payware using the SDK but don't have a developer licence, but as regards freeware I can't see there being any problems. I mean they'd have to look pretty closely to tell if you'd made it with the FSX SDK anyway, and they probably have better things to be getting on with.
Image

DogTailRed2
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 649
Joined: 24 May 2008, 07:52

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by DogTailRed2 »

Never tried it, never will.
I've invested 6 years in FSX (probably 30 from the days of Sublogic), what with add-ons, aircraft, pc upgrades etc.
Didn't see the point in MS Flight.

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by Garry Russell »

But it was never intended to be an FS.X replacement...it was something different and to be treated as such. :lol:
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

DogTailRed2
Concorde
Concorde
Posts: 649
Joined: 24 May 2008, 07:52

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by DogTailRed2 »

So what was the benefit of MS Flight then?
Simplified flight experience - well that turns of the majority of Flight Simmers.
More of a game experience - well that turns off all the gamers as flightsims per-se are relatively booring when compared to MW2.
Graphically superior - not from what I've seen.
Still don't get it, neither did anyone else it would seem.

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16759
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by TSR2 »

The out of the box graphics where far superior to FS9 and FSX and the environment was quite clever, wind blowing and moving trees etc. It was good fun, but not designed as an FSX replacement, for that you need to look to P3D which the community seems to be turning to now and I must admit I'm a big fan of. The only think that worries me about P3D is that it only sits loosely with Lockheed Martins core business, so might get spun off at some point when the bean counters decide its not what they want to be doing any more. :lol:
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

User avatar
TSR2
The Ministry
Posts: 16759
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 14:32
Location: North Tyneside, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft Flight Discontinued

Post by TSR2 »

interesting thread over on the P3D forum and some valid comments too...

http://www.prepar3d.com/forum-5/?mingle ... pic&t=1435
Ben.:tunes:

ImageImageImage

Post Reply