Page 3 of 3

Re: Frankly my dears...I don't give a d*mn...

Posted: 15 Feb 2012, 14:49
by airboatr
speedbird591 wrote:
If geographical proximity was a valid claim, then Canada would have an equally valid claim on Alaska.

Ian :)
hey now, don't be given the Canucks any ideas, We won Alaska from Russia in a game of guess which walnut shell has a pea under it. :agree:

besides, we let them invade Florida every winter. :wasntme:

Re: Frankly my dears...I don't give a d*mn...

Posted: 15 Feb 2012, 21:48
by TobyV
Would Mr Penn be of the same mind if someone came along and said "Hello, we want Hawaii, it's nearer to us than it is to you"?

I for one wwon't be watching his films any more. Actually, I am struggling to think of anything that I have seen which he's been in :dunno: :lol:

Re: Frankly my dears...I don't give a d*mn...

Posted: 16 Feb 2012, 15:33
by Garry Russell
Seems that Mr. Penn is off Ben Fogle's Christmas card list 8)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... Fogle.html

Re: Frankly my dears...I don't give a d*mn...

Posted: 16 Feb 2012, 22:23
by AllanL
Mind you, he may not favour this suggestion for post-colonial correction of a land grab.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timst ... -mexicans/

:lol:

Re: Frankly my dears...I don't give a d*mn...

Posted: 16 Feb 2012, 23:41
by nigelb
AllanL wrote:Mind you, he may not favour this suggestion for post-colonial correction of a land grab.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timst ... -mexicans/

:lol:

Great idea there! Thanks for the link.

Nigel²

Re: Frankly my dears...I don't give a d*mn...

Posted: 18 Feb 2012, 11:25
by basys
I liked this one best - The Daily Mash