Page 3 of 4

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 08 Jan 2009, 21:10
by DaveB
Cheers Andy. I got that information off the RAF Website.. http://www.raf.mod.uk/ :lol:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 08 Jan 2009, 22:35
by Hot_Charlie
DaveB wrote: I got that information off the RAF Website.. http://www.raf.mod.uk/ :lol:
Accurate as ever! :lol:

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 08 Jan 2009, 22:53
by forthbridge
DaveB wrote:
Yeah why do they fly them in pairs do they do that with the Tristars?
Happy New Year James :wave:

One of the guys has already mentioned why the '10s' do it if you scroll back a few posts ;-) All the RAF 10's have a permanently fitted receiving probe.. not all the RAF Tristars do. The max fuel that can be carried by a VC10(K3) is around 73tonnes and a K4 (no internal tanks) is 68tonnes (C1K a little more at 69.8). Plonk this against a Tristar which with internal tanks fitted can carry 139.7tonnes.. you'll see that the necessity for a Tristar to receive fuel is a lot less than a VC10 ;-)

ATB

DaveB :tab:
You know..... there have been some realy terrible aviation themed movies over the years... but I have thought for a long time that AAR would make a good subject for many reasons..... How about 'Service stations in the sky' with differing operatiors using unethical means to get their fuel sold? or some sort of Del Boy character pilot.... :think: (thats' not aimed at anyone in particular)... seriously, I think perhaps in these times certain types of aviation (fictional) action may be off-limit, but it's good to imagine........ :drinkers:

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 08 Jan 2009, 23:20
by ianhind
Thanks for the explanation Tonks.

I had seen a pair of VC10s on a couple of occasions, but the photos here made me realise that this was quite common.

Now we know why.

Ian

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 10 Jan 2009, 00:56
by DaveB
Who the heck is that handsome young PIC in the RH seat Mr T?? :think: ;-)

You do realise of course that it's much easier to do that in real life than it is in flightsim :lol:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 10 Jan 2009, 01:22
by spatialpro
Is that a (virtual) guantlet I hear hitting the floor??!! ;-)

CBFS vs. 101 Sqn?
VC10s at 10 paces?

:lol: :lol:

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 10 Jan 2009, 07:10
by Chris Trott
Airtrooper wrote:Is that a (virtual) guantlet I hear hitting the floor??!! ;-)

CBFS vs. 101 Sqn?
VC10s at 10 paces?

:lol: :lol:
Don't tempt them. Tonks and HC will show them how its done by flying the formation inverted in the sim. :)

Although, I still want to see a probe-equipped receiver try to tank inverted just once. Can't do it with a boom for obvious reasons, but there's no reason a Tornado, Eurofighter, or Super Bug (F/A-18 Super Hornet) couldn't do it.

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 10 Jan 2009, 22:30
by airboatr
Great shots Tonks

like the last one , that tail is amazing from that angle , looks big enough to tuck up under and get out of the rain.. :lol:

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 11 Jan 2009, 00:21
by SkippyBing
Although, I still want to see a probe-equipped receiver try to tank inverted just once.
What like this?

Image

Re: VC-10'S at 8,000ft?

Posted: 11 Jan 2009, 04:15
by Chris Trott
Umm...image didn't come through I guess, I don't see anything.