Page 13 of 22
Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 13 Jun 2012, 10:07
by DaveG
Hi Rick, that's in FS9. From what I've read elsewhere it doesn't work in 'X.
Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 18:58
by DaveG
If anyone wants it, I've uploaded ZE701 here:
http://daveg.cbfsim.org/files/ZE701.qwl
It's in QWL format so it can be installed using the Quality Wings Dispatcher proggy.
It's listed as an RJ70 at the moment. I'll re-do it properly when the 146s are released.

Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 20:04
by TSR2
Lovely stuff!

Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 20:46
by DaveG
Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 20:47
by DaveB
Smashing Dave.. tks a lot
Don't feel shy doing the 85's or 100's you fancy. The VA doesn't have 70's/Srs1's
EDIT: Dave.. that paint comes down as a zip even though it has a qwl extension

Matters not
ATB
DaveB

Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 22:06
by DaveG
They are zips in reality Dave, just with the extension changed to QWL.
I'll have a look at some others over the next few days.
I'm sure there's a FlyBe planned for the official 146 release, so I probably won't do that one. May have a look at Titan next, although that one may be a bit tricky
Maybe Dan Dare

Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 22:37
by TSR2
BAe / Titan / FlyBe all had an RJ at some point, so they would be right for the type. The problem is that many of the photos are listed as 146's when they're not

Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 22:59
by Garry Russell
In theory they are all 146's and registered as such
The difference being in this case BAe.146 Srs.100 or Avro 146 RJ-70
Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 23:02
by TSR2
Fair point Garry. The only BAe House colours I can find on the RJ are G-ISEE

Re: BAe146 / Avro RJ
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 23:10
by Garry Russell
Personally I always tend to think of them as BAe 146 and Avroliner RJ, I guess they retained the 146 for certification like the MD-80 series which are all theoretically DC 9-8## except the 88 which was significantly different was was a Mcdonnell Douglas MD-88.
I find that referring to them all as 146 is technically correct but confusing and I wish caption writers would either call them something like I do or quote the full designation.
Anyhoo Ben...Mr. 146...are you happy with this bunny??
