Page 2 of 5

Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 23:21
by DispatchDragon
Garry R
Overspeed is a bell.....or at least it was
Ive meant to drop DM a note about that - may have been a bell on BA aircraft
but on Dan Airs 1-11s its was a clacking sound which was disabled by pulling 2 CBs behind the Captain 34 and 35 I believe. - They all sounded exactly same .


Leif

Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 01:40
by Garry Russell
Hi Leif

Just to clarify

My reference was to what the overspeed has, been as far as I know, always been and still is, a bell on the DM One-Eleven.

I have no idea what it is in real life. Individual operators may well have their own thing. :dunno:

It's more than likely Dan Air was different to BA as the BA was a different set up altogether.

Certainly wouldn't surprise me :think:

Garry

Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 05:23
by DispatchDragon
Sokay Garry

I was curious as Dans 1-11s were a hodge podge bunch but that was
one thing they had in common - It sticks in my mind as it was common
practice ( :shock: ) to pull the overspeed breakers by DA crews and cruise
around at .76-77 and as I said it was a very distinctive clacking, and the
current bell on DMs 1-11 is closer to the sound of the fire warning on Dans aircraft - (Even in the 70s there was an attempt to assign different sounds to different functions, the altitude alerter on Dans 1-11s was a tone similar to that found on Boeing models, and so on)


Leif

Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 08:36
by me4246
Thanks a lot for you advices. Yes, it was cabin pressure that horn, and it seems sufficient to set a cabin pressure upper than 2000' to have a quiet trip...
Incidentally I went overspeed (what a great pilot!) and heard the nice bell sound...nothing to do with those Boeing horns! :smile:

Francesco

Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 11:07
by Garry Russell
Hi Francesco

Glad you're sorted

The newer panels from DM and Vraser mean you have to do it by the book ....or else :lol:

Garry

Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 17:47
by MALTBY D
Thanks everyone for advising on this in my absence.

The overspeed bell sound was recorded from AZMF (but don't tell anyone :wink: ), so it wasn't a BA only thing.
And as Basil Fawlty quite rightly stated - "It doesn't sound anything like the fire bell, it's a semi-tone higher!" :smile:

DM

Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 21:04
by Garry Russell
Unless of course 'ZMF was modified when it was with BA :think:

But maybe not :dunno:

Garry

Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 01:29
by DaveB
Hi Garry,

ZMF's panel is exactly as it was prior to DM's update.. basically, a more up-to-date version of the 'non-BA' panel. What this boils down to is a GPS unit on the pedestal and a TCAS V/S gauge in place of the 'mechanical' one now in place on both DM panels :wink:

She was never an 'off the production line' BEA/BA aircraft mate and had been in service for 16years before finally becoming a 'merged' BA airframe so I doubt she was ever fitted with the 'Trident like' panels as fitted to the 510ED's :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 11:46
by Garry Russell
Hi Dave

I know she was a BCAL and the panel was used in FS :lol:

I wasn't suggesting she had a BA panel :shock: ...just perhaps a BA warning sound added. :k:

It was suggested tha BA may have had a bell and non BA another sound but the theory was negated because ZMF had the bell.

So I was just pointing out that ZMF had been with BA (4 years) so it can't be assumed that that was the original warning although it probably was. :lol:

As you say the 510 and possibly the 539 series had the BA panel

Garry

Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 11:54
by DaveB
:lol: :lol:

No.. I know :wink: This anomaly is one of the reasons One-Eleven pilots couldn't nip between types without first being type-rated :smile: I suppose bits might have migrated from one aircraft type to another but something as significant as an alarm would have necessitated a change in the flight manual and wouldn't have been feasable for one airframe otherwise the type-rating would be null and void.

Interesting subject all the same :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab: