Page 2 of 2
Posted: 13 Oct 2006, 01:50
by DaveB
I've used it on 2 flights this evening and I dunno but I seem to be getting a greater frame hit.. eg, it's digging into my resources a little more. Neither Cambridge or Southend are exactly 'demanding' as far as scenery goes but approaches to both seemed sluggish.
Could be my system is a bit tired today?? :think:
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Posted: 13 Oct 2006, 03:07
by DanKH
I've had none of so....
Posted: 13 Oct 2006, 21:01
by MALTBY D
Seemed ok to me Dave.
Do you use real weather, could it have been due to the clouds?
I didn't know you could pause with FlyNet anyway. Will this new one let you then?
DM
Posted: 13 Oct 2006, 21:37
by RAF_Quantum
Hi DM,
All earlier versions of the Client I have used have allowed you to pause. As this new client has only added a new 'AutoUpdate' then I'm sure that you will still be able to pause.
Rgds
John
Posted: 13 Oct 2006, 21:50
by DaveB
I didn't realise you could pause either!! :roll:
It's been ok on frames today so my guess is the system was pretty tired.. I know I was
Never noticed a frame drop at Cambridge but that said.. I can't remember the last time I flew either into or out of there
I suppose that the runway I was on had Mildenhall and Lakenheath directly on the runway heading and only a few miles away so this could have caused the stutttttttttter too
Btw.. if anyone is thinking of flying to Lourdes.. don't unless it's from Jersey in a DC3. From Southend, it's one of the most boring flights I've ever done :huf:
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 11:39
by TobyV
Dave, I seem to be getting lower frame rates with the new client too. Got 6 or 7 fps at night on the ground at CDG. Things improved quite a bit in the climb and cruise - varying between 16 and 24 fps.
Damn thing CTD'd as I attempted to change the zoom on the GPS prior to establishing on the ILS on the way into LGW. In the words of James May, "Oh C*ck!". Going to have to find time to fly it again now
