Page 2 of 2

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 11:52
by Airspeed
Echo the above, great stuff Mr Tonks.
Last time I was on Lundy (1958 or thereabouts) there was such wind, I'm surprised clouds would ever stick like in the photo. :-O

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 13:46
by Archer
Lovely photos! Is it just me or do those Typhoons look too clean?? Almost as if they're not real..... ;)

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 15:29
by Trev Clark
very nice! im intreuged as to what the Typhoons are carrying on their pylons...
Empty plastic housings that were once intended for the latest ECM equipment, until the development went 10 years late and 20 times over budget, is my guess!

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 18:21
by TobyV
Great shots :thumbsup:

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 22:21
by Tonks
Cheers for the comments... It was a nice first flight of the year. Off for my second tomo, but hope we don't see any Typhoons on this one!!!

Tonks :)

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 22:22
by Chris Trott
The pylon attachments look like ACMI pods for electronic dogfighting. We have them in the US -

Image

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 23:52
by DaveB
They do indeed Chris. Not quite the same but very similar for sure :thumbsup:

ATB
DaveB B)smk

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 13 Jan 2012, 00:14
by airboatr
Right Dave, yours fly on the left side of the sky. ;)

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 13 Jan 2012, 09:01
by Chris Sykes
that was my first guess but they are very different, no attena, just bulges...

Re: A bit of AAR...

Posted: 13 Jan 2012, 10:26
by Chris Trott
The version of ACMI I linked is only one of about a half dozen variants out there in the US. The only thing they have in common is that the system is based around a Sidewinder body. The UK has alternately used Sidewinder and ASRAAM bodies, and the pod shown there appears to be an ASRAAM body for the base. The thing with ACMI is that there's not a whole lot of info out there on them because so much of what they do is understandably classified.