Page 2 of 2
Re: More low flying
Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 10:36
by Garry Russell
Really stupid
He should be treated in the same way as if he'd actually hit something..........just pure chance he didn't
Garry
Re: More low flying
Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 19:00
by jonesey2k
I suppose you can't blame them for wanting a bit of fun. It must be boring being stationed in the middle of nowhere with nothing to do and with a variety of equipment just begging to be thrown around a bit.
Re: More low flying
Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 19:05
by Garry Russell
Those men are supposed to be above such things..........they are trained....they should be doing the right thing.
Nearly killing your mates is not fun
Garry
Re: More low flying
Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 19:11
by TSR2
Natural selection will take care of it, no need to legislate.
Re: More low flying
Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 19:20
by Garry Russell
XR219 wrote:Natural selection will take care of it, no need to legislate.
Survival of the shortest
Garry
Re: More low flying
Posted: 15 Feb 2008, 19:30
by Pringle
jonesey2k wrote:I suppose you can't blame them for wanting a bit of fun. It must be boring being stationed in the middle of nowhere with nothing to do and with a variety of equipment just begging to be thrown around a bit.
You can blame them. These men are professional aviators, they are being paid by their government to do a job. This is not it. They don't spend millions on the training and equipment to have it spanked into the ground just because they were 'bored'.
After incidents close to heart, professionalism is a huge issue for me.