Page 2 of 2

Re: Old girl still in the skies.....

Posted: 26 Jan 2008, 12:11
by DaveB
The one in the film looks very much like Stage3.. the shot of N164W looks like a standard Stage2 to me. Odd they let it fly if it is but I suppose the 'Experimental' tag helps :think:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Re: Old girl still in the skies.....

Posted: 26 Jan 2008, 12:15
by Garry Russell
Hi Leif

Is it like the one in the film??

Garry

Re: Old girl still in the skies.....

Posted: 26 Jan 2008, 12:51
by DispatchDragon
Never mind answered my own question - the one for sale has QRV Stage 3 kits on it - and Northrups is also Stage 3

Leif

Re: Old girl still in the skies.....

Posted: 26 Jan 2008, 13:50
by Rick Piper
BOOOOOTiful! :thumbsup:

Re: Old girl still in the skies.....

Posted: 26 Jan 2008, 17:53
by Chris558
DaveB wrote:Look at it this way Chris..

How many 1-11's are there compared to Scarebuses or 72/73/74/75/76/777's e t c. It's not the odd 1-11 that's causing a hole in the Ozone ;-) Stage3 seems to work quite well doesn't it :cpu:

ATB

DaveB :tab:
Dave, I'M not critising the old girl - it's the do-gooders I'm refering to. :)

I love a REAL Jet, and that's one that produces a great carbon SMOKY footprint, and sticks two fingers up to those who say that we are 100% responsible for global warming, when we simply just ain't.

Climate change, whatever you want to call it WOULD HAVE HAPPENED ANYWAY. It's how the Earth evolves. Ok, we MAY have contributed very slightly, but that's human evolution. It was all in the 'blueprint' to enable us to evolve, and now engines/emissions are much cleaner anyway. :)

Wasn't going to rant, but my post just seemed to......EVOLVE!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Old girl still in the skies.....

Posted: 26 Jan 2008, 18:08
by DaveB
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I wasn't critisizing either Chris :lol: Nice rant there though :cpu:

ATB

DaveB :tab: