Page 2 of 2

Re: VC-10 on airliners.net

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 07:57
by TobyV
Wasn't you flying on that day was it?

Re: VC-10 on airliners.net

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 12:33
by Hot_Charlie
This may be me being completely mad/blind (no change there), but if it's a K3 shouldn't it have a HDU? :worried: STUPID

Nice picture though... :dancer: :)

Re: VC-10 on airliners.net

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 12:50
by tonymadge
proudly on my desktop an excellent picture :D

Re: VC-10 on airliners.net

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 14:00
by jab
Thats a fantastic Vicky 10 picture :dance: I think The RAF should use that shot for something to do with there Vicky 10 :thumbsup:


James

Re: VC-10 on airliners.net

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 16:29
by airboatr
you thunketh correctamundo :)

Re: VC-10 on airliners.net

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 17:09
by Hot_Charlie
airboatr wrote:you thunketh correctamundo :)

Makes a change... :dancer: :lol:

Re: VC-10 on airliners.net

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 22:10
by TobyV
Another email from the photographer:
Hi Toby,
Thanks to the CBFS forum for spotting my naughty "gap filler" when I filled out the reg (it was dark,and I didn't get the reg). I chose a K3 reg,not a C1K! The only people to spot it were you guys.

I have spoken to a friend of mine at Brize ATC (tower night shift) who has supplied me with the real reg (XV102),which has been resubmitted on Airliners.net,along with the new codes,and construction number.

Well spotted!

Cheers
Jamie Wilkins
Well spotted HC!