AS Prowler

Paul K · Post by **Paul K** » 08 Dec 2007, 00:30

DaveB wrote:If that had been an ETPS paint.. I reckon you'd have got away with it (for me anyway). Giving them FAA Sqn liveries on the other hand is almost sacrificial.

A) They're American
B) We don't have any aircraft carriers

Might work for someone though and that's the beauty of fsim ;-)

ATB

DaveB :tab:

I love those ' what if ' repaints. If we had kept a proper carrier force, it's not to difficult to imagine that the Prowler might have been on the FAA inventory. And I've read Grumman E2C Hawkeye in the same sentences as Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales recently! ;-)

Quixoticish · Post by **Quixoticish** » 08 Dec 2007, 01:02

Chris Sykes wrote:Dont forget Chris, that the Razbam one drops bombs too

I've actually no interest in dropping bombs in FS I must admit, I use FS to enjoy flying and operating the machinery itself, if I want to blow things up F4 or LOMAC are both far better alternatives. What interests me more about droppable bombs is the ability to load different stores onto different pylons (pick something and load it directly onto a pylon, not load up a model that has a certain loadout) and have the extra weight and drag simulated automatically without having to faff around with the payload/weight editor in FS and tweak .air and .cfg files. I'm hoping this will be something that becomes far more commonplace in the future, time will tell I guess.

Quixoticish · Post by **Quixoticish** » 08 Dec 2007, 01:04

DaveB wrote:If that had been an ETPS paint.. I reckon you'd have got away with it (for me anyway). Giving them FAA Sqn liveries on the other hand is almost sacrificial.

A) They're American
B) We don't have any aircraft carriers

Might work for someone though and that's the beauty of fsim ;-)

ATB

DaveB :tab:

They certainly work for me or I wouldn't have bothered.

Besides, who knows what the future holds with JSF and the two new carriers, whilst I doubt we'll see Prowlers as they'll be dead and buried by then it's an interesting concept nonetheless. Expect a whole slew of fictional FAA repaints from me when VRS release their Superbug, and IRIS when they finish the E-2C. :flying:

I've actually just realised I've fired them all off to the big three FS websites and called them 809 rather than 899 NAS. Cue mailbox full of whining spam, but it took me the best part of an hour to get them uploaded and I simply can't be bothered doing it again.

Post by **TSR2** » 08 Dec 2007, 01:37

I love those ' what if ' repaints. If we had kept a proper carrier force, it's not to difficult to imagine that the Prowler might have been on the FAA inventory. And I've read Grumman E2C Hawkeye in the same sentences as Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales recently! ;-)

God forbid!

I do like these aircraft, much as I love the \Viking... but only on US decks.... The thought over either on a Brit Carrier sends a cold shiver....

Paul K · Post by **Paul K** » 08 Dec 2007, 02:22

Wouldn't be the first time a Grumman has flown from a RN flight deck, Ben. And given the pitiful home-grown designs we had available to us in 1939, I have to say the Yanks were light years ahead of us when we needed them.

Seaking · Post by **Seaking** » 08 Dec 2007, 02:38

Hats off to ya for those RN skins, to me there's nothing wrong in just having some fun with the sim
and doing what ever you want.
As always you have a choice, if ya don't like it don't download it.
I have always been of the same voice.......the sim when it comes down to it, is just a game serious to some, pleasure to others
I admire the people that go "outside of the box".......any chance of you doing one for 824 sqdn lol

Now don't kick me to hard.

Chris Trott · Post by **Chris Trott** » 08 Dec 2007, 05:51

Chris H wrote:I was dead keen on this and it was a definite purchase until I found out that the vanes on the front of the ECM pods don't rotate, so I don't know if I can justify £20 at the moment for a model that I'll just alpha out the ECM pods on and fly either clean or clean with two tanks... just doesn't seem worthwhile. But that said I believe Razbams Prower will be FSX only so chances are this will be the only decent EA-6B for FS9.

Also remember that the ECM pod generators don't spin unless they're powered up, so it's not entirely "unrealistic" to have them static. Found that out after being fortunate enough to get to speak with an EA-6B crew last year at the Fort Worth JRB Airshow.

Tweek · Post by **Tweek** » 08 Dec 2007, 10:27

XR219 wrote:
I love those ' what if ' repaints. If we had kept a proper carrier force, it's not to difficult to imagine that the Prowler might have been on the FAA inventory. And I've read Grumman E2C Hawkeye in the same sentences as Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales recently! ;-)
God forbid!

I do like these aircraft, much as I love the \Viking... but only on US decks.... The thought over either on a Brit Carrier sends a cold shiver....

I'd infinitely prefer either over having F-35s on our carriers! Can an effective jet fighter get any uglier? :o

airboatr · Post by **airboatr** » 08 Dec 2007, 10:48

A friend in need is a friend indeed

The F35 breaks a lot of barriers to get a job done
ugly or not it will get it done.

Post by **TSR2** » 08 Dec 2007, 11:35

Paul K wrote:Wouldn't be the first time a Grumman has flown from a RN flight deck, Ben. And given the pitiful home-grown designs we had available to us in 1939, I have to say the Yanks were light years ahead of us when we needed them.

Very true indeed, we never really appreciated the benifits of Naval aviation in the early war years, and the American designs were very robust aircraft.

RE. the F35, I still recogon the Harrier is the better option over the F35... its too big and too complex, I'm really not a fan.

Classic British Flight Sim

AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler

Re: AS Prowler