Page 2 of 3

Posted: 25 May 2007, 01:35
by Chris Sykes
If i remember rightly the RN Lynxs couldnt do a flip anyway due to all the sonar etc equipment in the back where as the Army one doesnt have that...

Posted: 25 May 2007, 01:39
by DaveB
That is the more likely scenario Chris. Nowt to do with a very expensive bit of kit dropping out of the underside :wink: Now I really AM confused :lol:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Posted: 25 May 2007, 01:51
by SkippyBing
Just to clear things up. RN Lynx have never had dipping sonar because it's a gay pinger faggot thing that makes every sortie similar to dying of pure boredom. The only reason RN Lynx can't go upside down is because we have a different mark of engine to the Army (204 not 205) there's some sort of magic oil filter type arrangement that means the Army cabs don't grind their engines to bits for the few hundredths of a second they're upside down. Obviously the RN Lynx is generally heavier than the Army/RM version on account of having an actual mission system/radar/missile firing capability but at the end of the day if we needed to go inverted we could.
Really nice job on the repaint, considering it's only been around for about a month, I'm slightly scared about the amount of detail you've got into it!!
Oh and if anyone is offended by the term 'gay pinger faggot thing' you should have worked harder at school you Merlin loser.

Posted: 25 May 2007, 02:01
by DaveB
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Tks Skip :wink:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Posted: 25 May 2007, 07:40
by AndyG
Cheers Andy, nice repaint! :thumbsup:

AndyG

Posted: 25 May 2007, 08:32
by snave
SkippyBing wrote:Just to clear things up. RN Lynx have never had dipping sonar because it's a gay pinger faggot thing that makes every sortie similar to dying of pure boredom. The only reason RN Lynx can't go upside down is because we have a different mark of engine to the Army (204 not 205) there's some sort of magic oil filter type arrangement that means the Army cabs don't grind their engines to bits for the few hundredths of a second they're upside down. Obviously the RN Lynx is generally heavier than the Army/RM version on account of having an actual mission system/radar/missile firing capability but at the end of the day if we needed to go inverted we could.
Really nice job on the repaint, considering it's only been around for about a month, I'm slightly scared about the amount of detail you've got into it!!
Oh and if anyone is offended by the term 'gay pinger faggot thing' you should have worked harder at school you Merlin loser.
None taken. The `gay pinger` I worked on, even twenty-some years ago would - if exposed to the air rather than used underwater - have quite literally exploded your little buzz-wagon into a squillion pieces, so that it fluttered down like confetti. Upside down or not. :poke:

How gay is fluttering confetti? :think:

There's something really pugnacious about the Navy Lynx. It's got a bow-legged stance and a beaten-about nose like a boxer who's had one fight too many. :smile:

Posted: 25 May 2007, 10:43
by igorski
Thanks for explanation SkippyBing, and ta to the others for their comments too :)

Why would the sonar have exploded if used above water?

Posted: 25 May 2007, 10:59
by SkippyBing
Why would the sonar have exploded if used above water?
God no, now you've asked him a question about sonar. I made that mistake once several hours later I came too having slipped into a coma whilst the Pinger type twittered on about harmonics and such like!

Posted: 25 May 2007, 11:22
by DaveB
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Andy.. I'd imagine it's to do with the heat generated by the sonar pulse. Chances are, as well as the crews do-dads being fried.. it'd frazzle the helicopters systems too :lol:

ATB

DaveB :tab:

Posted: 27 May 2007, 00:24
by Kevin Farnell
Superb effort, Andy

Here is the real thing at Duxford, last weekend.

Image

Hard to tell the difference.

Regards.

Kevin