Harrier Landing Accident

The Crewroom for non-FS related stuff, fun and general chat.

Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry

Post Reply
User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Harrier Landing Accident

Post by Garry Russell »

Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
DaveB
The Ministry
Posts: 30457
Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
Contact:

Re: Harrier Landing Accident

Post by DaveB »

Jeez :-O I note how long he stayed with it before banging out. Pity there's not more footage showing how it ended up.

ATB
DaveB B)smk
ImageImage
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Harrier Landing Accident

Post by Garry Russell »

He got out, but at that height he was still moving a bit when he landed...the acceleration of the ejection is really shown well in the clip too.

He looks like was going to stay with it but then the fire started round the cockpit so he went for a Sharp exit a hard decision to make with the dangers of ground ejections not always making it the safest option :worried:
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

User avatar
FlyTexas
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 7151
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 10:18
Location: Texas

Re: Harrier Landing Accident

Post by FlyTexas »

Garry Russell wrote:...the acceleration of the ejection is really shown well in the clip too.
I'll say! :-O It looked like a doll with fireworks attached to it. :lol: I wonder how many g's you're pulling when you punch out of the aircraft?

Brian

User avatar
Garry Russell
The Ministry
Posts: 27180
Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
Location: On the other side of the wall

Re: Harrier Landing Accident

Post by Garry Russell »

I don't know if it's still the case but at one time your were only allowed a certain number...three sticks to mind *-) ... as you were a little shorter each time due to spinal compression

How much is truth I don't know but there are folks here who will know :worried:
Garry

Image

"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."

Dev One
Vintage Pair
Vintage Pair
Posts: 2591
Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 08:33
Location: Chacombe about 2 mile east of M40 J11

Re: Harrier Landing Accident

Post by Dev One »

The max g from a Lightning ejection is I believe about 27g for a very short time. (Its got a double -or triple- system of bangs in the gun) I also believe that most Lightning ejectees suffer from spine compression.
Its amazing to note that a lightning in a vertical spin is going faster downwards than the ejection seat can push upwards!!!
The earlier Mk 4 seats gave about 24g, with the rocket pack versions reducing the peak g by qite a bit. The earlier seats for say the Meteor were even more kind to ones spine
If you ask a pilot who has ejected what he remembers if ejected by a rocket pack version, it is that he can see the rocket flame - that means unfortunately that the shoulder harness does not support one as shown by dummies, but that one has ones chest on ones thighs.....
Keith

User avatar
FlyTexas
Red Arrows
Red Arrows
Posts: 7151
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 10:18
Location: Texas

Re: Harrier Landing Accident

Post by FlyTexas »

Thanks for the info fellas. :)

Brian

User avatar
VC10
Vulcan
Vulcan
Posts: 471
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 22:32
Location: Guildford

Re: Harrier Landing Accident

Post by VC10 »

I thought he left ejecting so late because he didn't want to draw attention to himself :)

I read the cause of the problem was he lost his pitch control at the last moment
If God had meant us to fly, he would have given us tickets.

Post Reply