Page 2 of 4
Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 20:04
by andy
Posted: 04 Apr 2006, 21:17
by Charlie Bravo
And for those who don't know how to resize, use Irfanview.
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 00:07
by Rich
To be on the safe side I have discontinued mine
Rich
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 00:24
by DaveB
Rich..
Have another read at the original thread and you'll see that I have highlighted your's as one of those that fit a whole lot into 600x100 (incidentally.. the size of your sig.bmp)
Get it back up here!! :dance:
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 10:27
by Filonian
Ooops, showing my ignorance again. I take it then that the pic showing onthe left is an avatar and the signature referred to is int the main body of the message? :redface:
Sorry about the delay in coming back, but I had a lot of preparation to do for Mess night yesterday. I must have enjoyed last night for I am now feeling even more wooly headed than normal. :partyman:
Graham
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 10:46
by Garry Russell
The signature is a panel at the bottom of a message some guys put a banner or image there.
There was a case the other day when one was the same size as a normal pic.
Garry
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 11:09
by Filonian
Many thanks Garry. Now where is my pencil and piece of paper so I can make a mental note of that
Graham
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 05:30
by Rich
DaveB, Sorry I seem to have missed that original thread, where is it ?
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 11:10
by DaveB
My apologies Rich. It seems I used both you and PeterM as good examples of what can be achieved in 600x100 in a PM I sent to Jake and
not in the open forum.. unless I also made a post to Ben_Ukmil on the same subject in the Gallery :roll: It's my age!
Peter's sig, while not 600pix wide is still around 100pix deep so I used his and yours as a benchmark
They're both
great sig's that prove bigger is not always better
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Posted: 08 Aug 2006, 17:29
by righthandseat
As a newbie - do I pass :think: