Signature BMP's
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
- Charlie Bravo
- Concorde
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: 27 Jun 2004, 12:03
- Location: STN/EGSS
Ooops, showing my ignorance again. I take it then that the pic showing onthe left is an avatar and the signature referred to is int the main body of the message? :redface:
Sorry about the delay in coming back, but I had a lot of preparation to do for Mess night yesterday. I must have enjoyed last night for I am now feeling even more wooly headed than normal. :partyman:
Graham
Sorry about the delay in coming back, but I had a lot of preparation to do for Mess night yesterday. I must have enjoyed last night for I am now feeling even more wooly headed than normal. :partyman:
Graham
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
My apologies Rich. It seems I used both you and PeterM as good examples of what can be achieved in 600x100 in a PM I sent to Jake and not in the open forum.. unless I also made a post to Ben_Ukmil on the same subject in the Gallery :roll: It's my age!
Peter's sig, while not 600pix wide is still around 100pix deep so I used his and yours as a benchmark They're both great sig's that prove bigger is not always better
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Peter's sig, while not 600pix wide is still around 100pix deep so I used his and yours as a benchmark They're both great sig's that prove bigger is not always better
ATB
DaveB :tab:
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
- righthandseat
- Meteor
- Posts: 59
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 18:21
- Location: Essex UK