Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
- Garry Russell
- The Ministry
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005, 00:53
- Location: On the other side of the wall
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
In the Monochrome days the pic used to wobble especially piston engines like Dakotas. They used to say it was the magnetos.
Garry
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
"In the world of virtual reality things are not always what they seem."
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
Interference on the old televisual box isn't something you see a lot of these days as RF shielding has got better. Almost everything with an HT lead would do it once upon a time
ATB
DaveB
ATB
DaveB
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
- Airspeed
- Red Arrows
- Posts: 9338
- Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
- Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
That's right, Dave,
Even the motor mower would put big moving white dots on the screen, as did anyone in the area using electric drills & saws. Suppressors were available and optional, but these days, equipment has to comply with interference codes. See the fine print on boxes.
Aircraft did the wobble quoted by Garry, so their contribution must have been different somehow. Whether the prop effect on air pressure distorted the signal is a possibility. I majored in correct lubrication of the axles on my Dinky racing cars, and later focussed on spectacularly failed attempts at wooing girls, so my opinion on this is as a casual observer.
Even the motor mower would put big moving white dots on the screen, as did anyone in the area using electric drills & saws. Suppressors were available and optional, but these days, equipment has to comply with interference codes. See the fine print on boxes.
Aircraft did the wobble quoted by Garry, so their contribution must have been different somehow. Whether the prop effect on air pressure distorted the signal is a possibility. I majored in correct lubrication of the axles on my Dinky racing cars, and later focussed on spectacularly failed attempts at wooing girls, so my opinion on this is as a casual observer.
-
- Vintage Pair
- Posts: 2580
- Joined: 10 Jul 2009, 08:33
- Location: Chacombe about 2 mile east of M40 J11
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
For the loss of TV signal with an aircraft flying low overhead.........Thats how Robert Watson-Watt discovered RADAR! The airframe is deflecting the signal. In France we get it sometimes when a train is passing through the digital signal between us & the transmitter!
Keith
Keith
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
Yes indeed. If the signal is weak enough and something passes between IT and your aerial.. you would get an out of phase picture. I seem to remember it being called convergence (a throw back from my days watching the BBC2 engineers test information)
ATB
DaveB
ATB
DaveB
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
I bought the Wilco A400M a few years back (seem to remember getting a bit of a ribbing for it here ) and I have to say, it's a very nice aircraft to fly.
It does have some quirky characteristics, such as floating along the runway, at about 50 ft and flat refusing to descend to touch down (might have been a shade on the speedy side, I suppose). It also has that dreadful 'glass' cockpit that looks a bit cheap 'n' cheerful in the Wilco model.
But I still enjoy flying it. There is also a freeware model available. The freeware one is okay, but I don't like the external model much - but I prefer its VC to the Wilco one. Maybe I should try and merge the two
It was by some French mob (Pierre, Thomas and Patrick Gmax Academy ) and at least it has a working HUD in FSX, unlike the FTW one.
Anyway, despite the functioning of the Wilco MFDs being a bit flakey, it did turn out to look very similar to the real thing. So those who were saying about "fantasy" aircraft being unwelcome around these parts may now have their slice of humble pie!
It does have some quirky characteristics, such as floating along the runway, at about 50 ft and flat refusing to descend to touch down (might have been a shade on the speedy side, I suppose). It also has that dreadful 'glass' cockpit that looks a bit cheap 'n' cheerful in the Wilco model.
But I still enjoy flying it. There is also a freeware model available. The freeware one is okay, but I don't like the external model much - but I prefer its VC to the Wilco one. Maybe I should try and merge the two
It was by some French mob (Pierre, Thomas and Patrick Gmax Academy ) and at least it has a working HUD in FSX, unlike the FTW one.
Anyway, despite the functioning of the Wilco MFDs being a bit flakey, it did turn out to look very similar to the real thing. So those who were saying about "fantasy" aircraft being unwelcome around these parts may now have their slice of humble pie!
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
The TV reception issue was when TV used VHF (before UHF). My Dad remembered Argosies causing interference flying overhead on approach to Benson.
Essentially, the Atlas is a Belfast replacement with tactical capability. Just a pity it don't look like one.
Essentially, the Atlas is a Belfast replacement with tactical capability. Just a pity it don't look like one.
- DaveB
- The Ministry
- Posts: 30457
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004, 20:46
- Location: Pelsall, West Mids, UK
- Contact:
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
I don't think it's quite a Belfast replacement since the Belfast was retired in '76.. or is RAF procurement that slow
ATB
DaveB
ATB
DaveB
Old sailors never die.. they just smell that way!
Re: Royal Air Force A.400M Atlas
Yes, but it should have stayed in service for at least 30 years. Or you could say it still was, under MoD contract, until Heavylift went bust.